Filed: Aug. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2019
Summary: AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT Re: ECF Nos. 53, 66 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore's report and recommendation, ECF No. 66, to grant Defendant/Cross-Claimant North American Specialty Co.'s ("NAS") motion for default judgment against Cross-Defendants Selina Singh, Majindar Singh, Bara Infoware, Inc., and Federal Solutions Group, Inc. ECF No. 25. NAS served Cross-Defendants wi
Summary: AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT Re: ECF Nos. 53, 66 JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore's report and recommendation, ECF No. 66, to grant Defendant/Cross-Claimant North American Specialty Co.'s ("NAS") motion for default judgment against Cross-Defendants Selina Singh, Majindar Singh, Bara Infoware, Inc., and Federal Solutions Group, Inc. ECF No. 25. NAS served Cross-Defendants wit..
More
AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Re: ECF Nos. 53, 66
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kandis Westmore's report and recommendation, ECF No. 66, to grant Defendant/Cross-Claimant North American Specialty Co.'s ("NAS") motion for default judgment against Cross-Defendants Selina Singh, Majindar Singh, Bara Infoware, Inc., and Federal Solutions Group, Inc. ECF No. 25. NAS served Cross-Defendants with the report on June 7, 2019. ECF No. 67. The period for objections has elapsed, and no objections were filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).
The Court finds the report correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. The defaulting cross-defendants have never appeared in the case, and NAS's motion for default judgment in the form of damages is supported by the record. In particular, the Court concurs in Judge Westmore's assessment of the factors enumerated by the Ninth Circuit in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1986). See ECF No. 66 at 6-9. The Court also agrees that an award of $3.5 million, plus prejudgment interest at an annual rate of 10 percent and post-judgment interest calculated according to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, is warranted here. Id. at 9-11.
Accordingly, the Court will enter judgment in those amounts in a separate document.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
