Hamiltonhausey v. Lewis, C 18-6179 WHA (PR) (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191029j49
Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DEFAULT JUDGMENT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff, a California state prisoner at San Quentin State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 31, 2019, defendant was ordered to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion within 63 days, or, before that date, to inform the court that she is of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment. More than 63 days have passed, and defendant has
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DEFAULT JUDGMENT WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . Plaintiff, a California state prisoner at San Quentin State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 31, 2019, defendant was ordered to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion within 63 days, or, before that date, to inform the court that she is of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment. More than 63 days have passed, and defendant has ..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DEFAULT JUDGMENT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a California state prisoner at San Quentin State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 31, 2019, defendant was ordered to file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion within 63 days, or, before that date, to inform the court that she is of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment. More than 63 days have passed, and defendant has failed to comply with that deadline without explanation. Defendant has filed an answer, but that too appears to be untimely; defendant has not explained this delay either. Defendant has also not requested an extension of either deadline.
Within 7 days of the date this order is filed, defendant shall show cause for her failure to comply with the court's order and to timely answer the Second Amended Complaint, and shall show cause why default judgment should not be entered against her. Failure to do so may result in the striking of defendant's answer, the entry of a default judgment, or both.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
