U.S. v. Johnson, 92-CR-00497 EMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180813497
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . This Court has previously held that Marvin Johnson is entitled to be resentenced, and at a Status Hearing on May 1, 2018, the Court set the Sentencing Hearing for September 19, 2018. At the last Court date, the government indicated it was going to obtain Johnson's BOP file and provide a copy to the defense. The government has now done so. Defense counsel needs to discuss some matters in the
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . This Court has previously held that Marvin Johnson is entitled to be resentenced, and at a Status Hearing on May 1, 2018, the Court set the Sentencing Hearing for September 19, 2018. At the last Court date, the government indicated it was going to obtain Johnson's BOP file and provide a copy to the defense. The government has now done so. Defense counsel needs to discuss some matters in the f..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
This Court has previously held that Marvin Johnson is entitled to be resentenced, and at a Status Hearing on May 1, 2018, the Court set the Sentencing Hearing for September 19, 2018. At the last Court date, the government indicated it was going to obtain Johnson's BOP file and provide a copy to the defense. The government has now done so. Defense counsel needs to discuss some matters in the file with Johnson in person and Johnson must be available for the upcoming resentencing.
At the last hearing, the parties also discussed setting a Status Hearing in advance of the resentencing, and the parties now jointly request a Status Hearing be set for September 5, 2018, at 2:30 p.m., during the Court's regularly scheduled criminal calendar. In order to assure the defendant's presence in this district to appear for the Status Hearing and the resentencing, the parties also request that the Court sign the contemporaneously filed Proposed Order directing the Marshal to bring Johnson to Court so that he may attend the status hearing. The defense believes that Johnson's continued presence in the Bay Area will expedite the resentencing process.
The Court sets a Status Hearing in this case for September 5, 2018 at 2:30pm.
Source: Leagle
