NASSERI v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., C 15-04001 WHA. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160706a89
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jul. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has received the parties' stipulated request to vacate the trial date and all related deadlines until plaintiff has successfully completed a trial period plan with a subsequent permanent modification to follow. If the terms of the permanent modification have already been agreed to, and if the settlement agreement has been executed (even though subject to completion of the trial period),
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has received the parties' stipulated request to vacate the trial date and all related deadlines until plaintiff has successfully completed a trial period plan with a subsequent permanent modification to follow. If the terms of the permanent modification have already been agreed to, and if the settlement agreement has been executed (even though subject to completion of the trial period), t..
More
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The Court has received the parties' stipulated request to vacate the trial date and all related deadlines until plaintiff has successfully completed a trial period plan with a subsequent permanent modification to follow. If the terms of the permanent modification have already been agreed to, and if the settlement agreement has been executed (even though subject to completion of the trial period), then the Court will grant the relief requested. But the application thus far has failed to show these points. The request to vacate the trial date and related deadlines is therefore DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to a second application demonstrating these points.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
