Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United Association of Journeyman and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry v. Maniglia Landscape, Inc., 17-CV-3037 RS. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190108780 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2019
Summary: CASE SCHEDULING STIPULATION AND [ proposed ] ORDER AFTER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . STIPULATION RE CASE SCHEDULING Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case Management Conference on December 20, 2018, where the Court and the parties agreed to the following: 1. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties have completed a session of mediation with the Hon. John M. True. No further mediation is presentl
More

CASE SCHEDULING STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER AFTER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

STIPULATION RE CASE SCHEDULING

Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case Management Conference on December 20, 2018, where the Court and the parties agreed to the following:

1. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION.

The parties have completed a session of mediation with the Hon. John M. True. No further mediation is presently planned.

2. AMENDING THE PLEADINGS.

Any amendment of the pleadings after the date of this stipulation and order shall be governed by Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

On November 30, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint. The Laborers Defendants moved to strike that complaint, and the motion is presently under submission. Plaintiffs and the Employer Defendants have agreed that the Employer Defendants will not be required to respond to the Third Amended Complaint until the Court has ruled on the pending motion to strike, and will be subject to the same terms the Court sets for the Laborers Defendants.

3. DISCOVERY.

On or before July 12, 2019, all non-expert discovery shall be completed by the parties. Until the Further Case Management Conference on August 29, 2019, the parties shall engage in interim discovery. Interim discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) six (6) non-expert depositions per party; (b) twenty-five (25) interrogatories per party as discussed, including all discrete subparts; (c) a reasonable number of requests for production of documents or for inspection per party; and (d) a reasonable number of requests for admission per party.

4. DISCOVERY DISPUTES.

Discovery disputes will be referred to a Magistrate Judge. After the parties have met and conferred, the parties shall prepare a joint letter of not more than 5 pages explaining the dispute. Up to 12 pages of attachments may be added. The joint letter must be electronically filed under the Civil Events category of "Motions and Related Filings > Motions—General > Discovery Letter Brief." The Magistrate Judge to whom the matter is assigned will advise the parties of how that Judge intends to proceed. The Magistrate Judge may issue a ruling, order more formal briefing, or set a telephone conference or a hearing. After a Magistrate Judge has been assigned, all further discovery matters shall be filed pursuant to that Judge's procedures.

5. EXPERT WITNESSES.

On or before July 26, 2019, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.

6. FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE.

A Further Case Management Conference shall be held on August 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference.

7. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS.

Dispositive motions will be heard no later than October 3, 2019. The parties may modify a motion's briefing schedule by agreement, but reply briefs must be filed no later than two weeks before a motion's hearing date.

8. TRIAL.

This case is set for trial on February 10, 2020, at 8:30 a.m..

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Attestation

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

By: John J. Davis, Jr.

ORDER OF APPROVAL

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer