Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Baldwin v. Colley, C15-02762 KAW. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160801625 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs MALAD BALDWIN AND KATHRYN WADE, and Defendants OFFICER JAMES COLLEY, OFFICER CASEY BROGDON; and CITY OF ANTIOCH, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following: 1. WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a civil rights complaint in the United States District Court in the Northern District of California on June 19, 2015, arising out of
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Plaintiffs MALAD BALDWIN AND KATHRYN WADE, and Defendants OFFICER JAMES COLLEY, OFFICER CASEY BROGDON; and CITY OF ANTIOCH, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following:

1. WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a civil rights complaint in the United States District Court in the Northern District of California on June 19, 2015, arising out of an incident relating to the arrest of Plaintiff by officer(s) with the Antioch Police Department, that occurred on April 28, 2014. 2. WHEREAS Defendants' attorneys of record from the McNamara Law Firm have a two week plus trial set to begin on September 12, 2016, in front of the Honorable Judge Charles R. Breyer, namely Banta v. Four Walnut Creek Police Officers, Case No. C13-00342 CRB. 3. WHEREAS Plaintiffs' attorney of record, Mark W. Kelsey, has a felony trial set to begin on September 27, 2016, in the Contra Costa County Superior Court, namely People v. Steven Lawrence Butler, Docket No. 01-175541-2, which is likely to take up to one month to complete. 4. WHEREAS this matter is currently set for a Further Case Management Conference on September 20, 2016, which will likely interfere with the previously scheduled trial indicated in Paragraph 2. 5. WHEREFORE, there is good cause to continue this Further Case Management Conference in this matter, and the parties, by and through their respective counsel, respectfully seek an Order from the Court to continue the Further Case Management Conference to Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 1:30 p.m..

IT IS SO STIPULATED

The parties attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from each of the other Signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

The Further Case Management Conference set for September 20, 2016, is hereby continued to November 8, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are to file the further Case Management Conference statement no later than one week prior to this conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer