Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JOHNSON v. KUMAR, 2:16-cv-0978 JAM DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170907b77 Visitors: 27
Filed: Sep. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2017
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . This action came before the court on September 1, 2017, for hearing of plaintiff's motion to compel. Attorney Mary Melton appeared telephonically on behalf of the plaintiff. No appearance was made by, or on behalf of, any defendant. 1 Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 17) is gran
More

ORDER

This action came before the court on September 1, 2017, for hearing of plaintiff's motion to compel. Attorney Mary Melton appeared telephonically on behalf of the plaintiff. No appearance was made by, or on behalf of, any defendant.1

Upon consideration of the arguments on file and those made at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on the record at that hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 17) is granted;

2. Within twenty-one days of the September 1, 2017 hearing defendants shall produce to plaintiff the requested discovery; and

3. Within twenty-one days of the September 1, 2017 hearing, defendants' attorney, Bruce A. Neilson, shall pay plaintiff $1,200 in sanctions.2

FootNotes


1. Nor did any defendant file an opposition to plaintiff's motion.
2. In this regard, this sanction shall be paid by attorney Neilson and not his clients.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer