Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bennett v. State Farm General Insurance Company, 1:14-CV-01377 JAM-JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160209706 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REVISE THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiffs and State Farm General Insurance Company ("State Farm"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to revise the Court's January 11, 2016 Amended Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (Dkt. 37) as follows: I. RECITALS 1. The parties have been working diligently toward moving this case forward in an efficient, expeditious manner. The following deadlines are currently in p
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REVISE THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER

Plaintiffs and State Farm General Insurance Company ("State Farm"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to revise the Court's January 11, 2016 Amended Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order (Dkt. 37) as follows:

I.

RECITALS

1. The parties have been working diligently toward moving this case forward in an efficient, expeditious manner. The following deadlines are currently in place:

• The deadline to complete initial expert witness disclosures is March 25, 2016; • The deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures is April 12, 2016; • The deadline for all discovery to be completed is May 20, 2016; • The deadline for hearing of dispositive motions is July 12, 2016; • The final pre-trial conference is August 26, 2016; • The trial date is October 17, 2016.

2. Despite the parties' diligent efforts, the parties anticipate that it will be difficult to engage in expert disclosures by the current deadline of March 25, 2016. The parties also recognize that the expert deadlines can be continued without impacting the other dates and deadlines in the current Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order. For these reasons, the parties have agreed to stipulate to a proposed order continuing the deadline for expert disclosure, rebuttal disclosure, and the discovery deadline.

3. The parties also wish to have a brief discovery window after the hearing on a dispositive motion to schedule depositions that will be unnecessary for the motion, which might be avoided if the motion is granted.

4. The parties are mindful of the pretrial dates and deadlines in the current Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order, including the Pretrial Conference and deadline to submit the Joint Pretrial Statement. The parties do not anticipate any issues meeting those deadlines under the new dates for expert disclosures and deadline for all discovery.

5. The parties do not seek to continue any deadlines other than the deadlines for expert disclosure, rebuttal disclosure, and completion of all discovery. The parties do not seek to continue the trial date or the pretrial conference date.

II.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following revisions to the court's Pretrial Schedule:

1. Expert Disclosure May 27, 2016________ (currently March 25, 2016) 2. Expert Rebuttal June 17, 2016________ (currently April 12, 2016) 3. Deadline to complete all discovery July 19, 2016______ (currently May 20, 2016)

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Pretrial Schedule is revised as follows:

1. Expert Disclosure May 27, 2016________ (currently March 25, 2016) 2. Expert Rebuttal June 17, 2016________ (currently April 12, 2016) 3. Deadline to complete all discovery July 19, 2016_____ (currently May 20, 2016)

The remaining dates and deadlines set forth in the Court's January 11, 2016 Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt 37) remain unchanged.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer