Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Miracle, 4:18-cr-260. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20190212888 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. STAN BAKER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Presentence Release. (Doc. 360.) The Government has filed no response to Defendant's Motion and, therefore, does not oppose Defendant's Motion. See Local Rule 7.5. Contingent on Defendant's satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Court's Order Setting Conditions of Release, filed contemporaneously with this Order, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Presentence Release. Therefo
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Presentence Release. (Doc. 360.) The Government has filed no response to Defendant's Motion and, therefore, does not oppose Defendant's Motion. See Local Rule 7.5. Contingent on Defendant's satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Court's Order Setting Conditions of Release, filed contemporaneously with this Order, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Presentence Release.

Therefore, after careful consideration and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143, the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released pending sentencing. The Defendant must comply with the conditions in the Order Setting Conditions of Release. The Court forewarns Defendant that her failure to comply can have significant negative consequences on the outcome of her case.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer