St. Peter's Hospital v. Lexington Insurance Company, CV 16-91-H-SEH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20180323e20
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER SAM E. HADDON , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion In Limine Re Damages. 1 On March 14, 2018, the Court ordered that this phase of litigation be limited to "issues related to the duty to defend contained in Count I of Plaintiffs' Complaint." 2 ORDERED: During the duty to defend phase oflitigation, the parties are precluded from introducing any comment, argument, testimony, or evidence concerning damages in the Underlying Suit, Fisher v. St.
Summary: ORDER SAM E. HADDON , District Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion In Limine Re Damages. 1 On March 14, 2018, the Court ordered that this phase of litigation be limited to "issues related to the duty to defend contained in Count I of Plaintiffs' Complaint." 2 ORDERED: During the duty to defend phase oflitigation, the parties are precluded from introducing any comment, argument, testimony, or evidence concerning damages in the Underlying Suit, Fisher v. St. P..
More
ORDER
SAM E. HADDON, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion In Limine Re Damages.1 On March 14, 2018, the Court ordered that this phase of litigation be limited to "issues related to the duty to defend contained in Count I of Plaintiffs' Complaint."2
ORDERED:
During the duty to defend phase oflitigation, the parties are precluded from introducing any comment, argument, testimony, or evidence concerning damages in the Underlying Suit, Fisher v. St. Peter's Hospital, et al, ADV 2014-722, First Judicial District, Lewis & Clark County, Montana, or this suit.
FootNotes
1. Doc. 79
2. Doc. 66 at 1.
Source: Leagle
