Banerjee v. Continental Incorporated, Inc., 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180731b70
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On June 15, 2018 Defendants Continental Incorporated, Inc. d/b/a Continental Enterprises and Leapers, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 68) (the "Motion"). By stipulation (ECF 71), the parties extended Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to the Motion from July 2, 2018 to July 19, 2018. Defendants' rep
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On June 15, 2018 Defendants Continental Incorporated, Inc. d/b/a Continental Enterprises and Leapers, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 68) (the "Motion"). By stipulation (ECF 71), the parties extended Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to the Motion from July 2, 2018 to July 19, 2018. Defendants' repl..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(First Request
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
On June 15, 2018 Defendants Continental Incorporated, Inc. d/b/a Continental Enterprises and Leapers, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 68) (the "Motion"). By stipulation (ECF 71), the parties extended Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to the Motion from July 2, 2018 to July 19, 2018. Defendants' reply is currently due on July 30, 2018.
The parties have stipulated to allow Defendants to file their reply on or before August 6, 2018. This is the first request for extension of this deadline. Defendants' counsel reasonably requires additional time to file their response due to the following reasons:
a. Attorney Betz, the attorney primarily responsible for drafting the reply brief, is currently out of the office on a family vacation through July 28, and then is traveling from July 29 through August 2 to assist with the care of a close friend while she recovers from major surgery; and
b. The client contact for Continental is currently out of the office (and out of state) on a family vacation for the next week.
Counsel for Plaintiffs agrees to this extension. This extension is not sought for purposes of undue delay and will not prejudice any party. Accordingly, the parties believe that extending the deadline is fair and that doing so will not prejudice any party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
