Nevada Title Company v. ACE American Insurance Company, 2:18-cv-1823-GMN-(VCF). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190312c14
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2019
Summary: THE PARTIES STIPULATION and (PROPOSED) ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF and COUNTER-DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT and COUNTER-CLAIMANT'S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO PHASE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ON CLAIMS RELATING TO NTC'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE (Doc No. 31) (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Counter-defendant, NEVADA TITLE COMPANY, ("NTC") by its counsel, Steven J. Parsons, of LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS, and Defendant and Co
Summary: THE PARTIES STIPULATION and (PROPOSED) ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF and COUNTER-DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT and COUNTER-CLAIMANT'S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO PHASE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ON CLAIMS RELATING TO NTC'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE (Doc No. 31) (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Counter-defendant, NEVADA TITLE COMPANY, ("NTC") by its counsel, Steven J. Parsons, of LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS, and Defendant and Cou..
More
THE PARTIES STIPULATION and (PROPOSED) ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF and COUNTER-DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT and COUNTER-CLAIMANT'S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO PHASE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS ON CLAIMS RELATING TO NTC'S PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
(Doc No. 31)
(First Request)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff and Counter-defendant, NEVADA TITLE COMPANY, ("NTC") by its counsel, Steven J. Parsons, of LAW OFFICES OF STEVEN J. PARSONS, and Defendant and Counter-claimant, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ("ACE American") by its counsel Richard C. Mason, of COZEN O'CONNOR, hereby stipulate and agree that NTC shall have to and including Monday, March 25, 2019 to respond to ACE American's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 31).
This Stipulation between the parties to allow NTC an additional time to respond to the Motion to Modify Scheduling Order is the first request. Plaintiff needs additional due diligence, upon the preparation of Plaintiff's responses to the written discovery requests from Defendant. This stipulation is not posed simply for the purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
