Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Shehee v. Redding, 1:14-cv-00706-DAD-SAB (PC). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20181102c83 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER DECLARING HIM A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT [ECF No. 126] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . At the time this action was filed, Plaintiff Gregory Ell Shehee was a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On September 27, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for an order declaring Plaintiff a vexatious litigant and ordering him to post securi
More

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN ORDER DECLARING HIM A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

[ECF No. 126]

At the time this action was filed, Plaintiff Gregory Ell Shehee was a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On September 27, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for an order declaring Plaintiff a vexatious litigant and ordering him to post security in order to proceed with the case.

Plaintiff's opposition was due within twenty-one (21) days of service of Defendants' motion. More than twenty-one days have passed, but Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(1). Plaintiff also has not otherwise communicated with the Court.

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(1), Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendants' motion within twenty (20) days. Plaintiff is warned that the failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute and failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer