Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Franco v. Espinoza, 1:18-cv-00057-DAD-SKO (HC). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190124872 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO FILE A RESPONSE SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, Maria Antonia Franco, is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On November 12, 2018, Petitioner, through counsel, filed an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 14). On December 11, 2018, the undersigned directed respondent to respond to the petition within sixty days. On January 18, 2019, Res
More

ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO FILE A RESPONSE

Petitioner, Maria Antonia Franco, is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 12, 2018, Petitioner, through counsel, filed an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 14). On December 11, 2018, the undersigned directed respondent to respond to the petition within sixty days.

On January 18, 2019, Respondent requested the undersigned clarify whether Respondent should respond to the original petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1), filed on November 3, 2017, or the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondent shall respond to the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 14), filed on November 12, 2018.

This order does not change the deadlines established in the Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition, (Doc. 17), signed on December 11, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer