Lipsey v. Reddy, 1:17-cv-00569-LJO-BAM (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180606969
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . As discussed in separate findings and recommendations, Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey has informed the Court that he does not yet have access to his legal property after a housing move. (Doc. 49.) Thus, the Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff an extension of time to file an opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed on Ma
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . As discussed in separate findings and recommendations, Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey has informed the Court that he does not yet have access to his legal property after a housing move. (Doc. 49.) Thus, the Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff an extension of time to file an opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed on May..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
As discussed in separate findings and recommendations, Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey has informed the Court that he does not yet have access to his legal property after a housing move. (Doc. 49.) Thus, the Court finds good cause to grant Plaintiff an extension of time to file an opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, filed on May 2, 2018. (Doc. 45.)
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's response to the pending motion for summary judgment is due within thirty (30) days of this order. Any further extension of time will require a motion supported by good cause filed before the deadline expires.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
