Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ARMSTRONG v. MERCED COUNTY, 1:11-CV-01632-LJO-SKO. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130521774 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 17, 2013
Latest Update: May 17, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST RESETTING PRE-TRIAL DATES; ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for the parties to this action, Robert D. Ponce, Law Offices of Robert D. Ponce, on behalf of plaintiffs ARMSTRONG et. al., Jerome Varanini, Trimble, Sherinian & Varanini, counsel for defendants, MERCED COUNTY, et al. and Stephen Shlens, Bertling & Clausen, counsel for defendant, ROXANNE LONCTOT, R.N., hereby agree and stipulate to the following: 1. That various pre-trial dates be contin
More

STIPULATION AND JOINT REQUEST RESETTING PRE-TRIAL DATES; ORDER

SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

Counsel for the parties to this action, Robert D. Ponce, Law Offices of Robert D. Ponce, on behalf of plaintiffs ARMSTRONG et. al., Jerome Varanini, Trimble, Sherinian & Varanini, counsel for defendants, MERCED COUNTY, et al. and Stephen Shlens, Bertling & Clausen, counsel for defendant, ROXANNE LONCTOT, R.N., hereby agree and stipulate to the following:

1. That various pre-trial dates be continued to later dates which are set forth below.

2. That the trial of this action remain set for March 11, 2014.

The reason for the continuation of the pre-trial dates is to allow the parties to engage in private mediation. The parties are undertaking extensive discovery. Defendants have taken the depositions of plaintiffs, MARTHA ARMSTRONG, KERED ARMSTRONG, and Stephanie Tross, Guardian ad Litem for DEREK ARMSTRONG, JR., and DEREK ARMSTRONG, JR. The parties have scheduled the depositions of Officer J. COLLINS, AMANDA GIBSON, R.N., ROXIE LONCTOT, R.N., Monica Jackson, R.N., Thiruk Viswanathan, M.D., and Phillip Sampson, P.A. Other depositions may be scheduled.

Upon the conclusion of these fact witness depositions, the parties will utilize the services of Jack Williams, Esq. (San Jose, CA), to mediate this case. The mediation is scheduled for July 1, 2013.

The proposed continuation of the pre-trial dates are as follows:

Currently Scheduled Date Proposed New Date Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff June 14, 2013 July 18, 2013 Expert Discovery Cutoff September 23, 2013 October 23, 2013 Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Reports Due July 15, 2013 August 15, 2013 Defendants' Expert Witness Reports Due July 31, 2013 August 31, 2013 Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline October 3. 2013 November 4, 2013 Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline November 8, 2013 December 9, 2013 Settlement Conference January 9, 2013 Remains set Pre-Trial Conference January 30, 2014 Remains set Jury Trial March 11, 2014 Remains set

ORDER

The parties, having entered into a stipulation to continue pre-trial dates and further having stipulated to having the trial date remain as set, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following dates be the effective dates for each pre-trial deadline:

Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff July 15, 2013 Expert Discovery Cutoff October 23, 2013 Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Reports Due August 15, 2013 Defendants' Expert Witness Reports Due August 31, 2013 Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline November 4, 2013 Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline December 9, 2013

The dates for the following remain set and are not continued:

Settlement Conference January 9, 2014 Pre-Trial Conference January 30, 2014 Jury Trial March 11, 2014

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer