Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. REED, 12-cr-00048-WJM. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20120504i78 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2012
Summary: PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JENCKS ACT MATERIAL AND RULE 16 MATERIAL WILLIAM J. MART NEZ, District Judge. This case is before the Court on the Government's Motion for Protective Order for Jencks Act and Rule 16 Material ("Motion") (ECF No. 210). The proposed Protective Order involves the use, custody, and circulation of Jencks Act and Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 material disclosed in relation to the above-captioned case. See Title 18 U.S.C. 3500; Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(2), 26.2 and 49.1; Giglio v.
More

PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JENCKS ACT MATERIAL AND RULE 16 MATERIAL

WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on the Government's Motion for Protective Order for Jencks Act and Rule 16 Material ("Motion") (ECF No. 210). The proposed Protective Order involves the use, custody, and circulation of Jencks Act and Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 material disclosed in relation to the above-captioned case. See Title 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(2), 26.2 and 49.1; Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 631-32 (2002) (upholding the right of the Government to withhold confidential informant information in the context of plea bargaining before trial). The Government represents that it has contacted counsel for each of the Defendants and none has expressed an opposition to the proposed Protective Order. (ECF No. 210 at 6.)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d) and the All Writs Act, Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651, the Court may enter a protective order regulating discovery in a criminal case if good cause therefor is established. In the Motion, the Government states that the Protective Order is necessary to alleviate concerns for witnesses or other persons that could stem from the unauthorized publication, duplication, or circulation of recordings or certain written documents (possibly to include photographs or personal identifying information reflected in NCIC/CCIC types of reports, or other records) which may be disclosed to the defense in the context of general pretrial discovery. The Protective Order addresses these concerns by ordering that the Rule 16 and Jencks Act protected documents shall not be left in the exclusive custody of a Defendant or be published outside of official proceedings in this case.1

The Court finds that there is good cause to enter the proposed Protective Order. The Court specifically finds that the Government's concerns have merit, that the burden on the defense of controlling the dissemination of such material is not unreasonably onerous, and that encouraging the early disclosure of Jencks Act material may encourage the fair and prompt resolution of the case.

Accordingly, the Government's Unopposed Motion for Protective Order Regarding Jencks Act Material and Rule 16 Material (ECF No. 210) is GRANTED. The Court therefore ORDERS as follows:

1. Jencks Act material, to include witness statements and reports of witness statements or debriefings, and Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 material, to include audio and/or video files (including transcripts), photographs, personal identifying information such as addresses, dates or birth, and social security numbers for witnesses or other persons, any NCIC/CCIC reports, similar records furnished to the defense by the Government, and Grand Jury transcripts, in this case shall be used only for official purposes related to judicial proceedings in this case, to include any appeal, and for no other purpose.

2. Jencks Act material reflecting the personal identifying information described above, to include records showing statements by witnesses, reports of witness statements or debriefing statements, audio files and/or video files (including transcripts) of the confidential informant(s), photographs, criminal history documents, or transcripts of Grand Jury testimony shall remain in the physical custody and control of the defense attorneys who have entered their appearance in this case, members of the defense attorneys confidential staff, a professional defense investigator working with the defense attorneys, a confidential assistant employed by the defense attorneys, or a CJA-approved expert witness. Such Rule 16 and Jencks Act material shall not be left in the exclusive custody of the Defendant (other than as proscribed by the read-only materials at the detention facilities). The Defendant, witnesses, and other persons assisting the attorneys for the Defendant may review the Rule 16 and Jencks Act material, but such review must be accomplished without violating the rule that the described Rule 16 and Jencks Act material is to remain, at all times, under the custody and physical control of the attorneys, either personally or through the custody and control of members of the defense attorney's confidential staff, a professional defense investigator working with the defense attorneys, a confidential assistant employed by the defense attorneys, or a CJA-approved expert witness.

3. Where a Defendant has been detained before trial pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3142 or 3145, the parties are directed to work with the U.S. Marshal Service to coordinate the reasonable availability of the above-described pretrial discovery material by use of read-only facilities under the custody and control of the warden, sheriff, or superintendent of the facility where the Defendant is being detained before trial. Such facilities must not allow a Defendant to e-mail or duplicate the material.

4. With the exception of copies prepared by counsel of record or their staff for official use in relation to this case, unless the attorneys for the defense and the Government come to a specific understanding to the contrary, the Jencks Act and Rule 16 material disclosed to the defense, to include disclosure made through the use of electronic media, shall not be copied, reproduced, published, or publicly circulated by the defense without further order of Court or until it is used in judicial proceedings at time of trial or in official hearings or proceedings related to this case.

5. In the event the defense and the Government agree that certain materials or documents should be exempted from the limits otherwise imposed by this Order, they may do so by mutual agreement and without further Court involvement.

6. In the event that the defense and the Government disagree or are unclear about the meaning or application of this Order with respect to some document, file, photograph, or other material in the case, the parties may bring the issue to the attention of the Court.

7. At the conclusion of the case, the described Rule 16 material and Jencks Act material, NCIC/CCIC records, audio files, video files, and photographs may be returned to the Government.

FootNotes


1. Discovery materials may be reviewed individually by in-custody Defendants at their detention facilities through read-only files and while the discovery remains in the control of the detention facility.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer