LaTourelle v. Barber, 2:10-CV-2667 MCE CMK. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20151015803
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the parties that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)1(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to Plaintiff RUTH LATOURELLE and Defendants, TERRY BARBER, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU and SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. IT IS SO STIPULATED. ORDER The par
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the parties that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)1(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to Plaintiff RUTH LATOURELLE and Defendants, TERRY BARBER, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU and SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. IT IS SO STIPULATED. ORDER The part..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the parties that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)1(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to Plaintiff RUTH LATOURELLE and Defendants, TERRY BARBER, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU and SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED. The above-referenced case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to Plaintiff RUTH LATOURELLE and Defendants, TERRY BARBER, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU and SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record.
Source: Leagle
