Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LaTourelle v. Barber, 2:10-CV-2667 MCE CMK. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151015803 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the parties that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)1(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to Plaintiff RUTH LATOURELLE and Defendants, TERRY BARBER, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU and SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. IT IS SO STIPULATED. ORDER The par
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned attorneys for the parties that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)1(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-referenced case should be DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to Plaintiff RUTH LATOURELLE and Defendants, TERRY BARBER, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU and SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated and agreed, it is hereby SO ORDERED. The above-referenced case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and without an award of costs or fees to Plaintiff RUTH LATOURELLE and Defendants, TERRY BARBER, COUNTY OF SISKIYOU and SISKIYOU COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer