Filed: Apr. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff appears in this action pro and in forma pauperis. On March 7, 2018 this court issued Findings and Recommendations that recommended that several of plaintiff's claims be dismissed, several defendants be dismissed, and supplemental state claims be dismissed. ECF No. 64. In issuing this document the court failed to give the parties an opportunity to object before the matter was referred to the district judge assigned to the case for final
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff appears in this action pro and in forma pauperis. On March 7, 2018 this court issued Findings and Recommendations that recommended that several of plaintiff's claims be dismissed, several defendants be dismissed, and supplemental state claims be dismissed. ECF No. 64. In issuing this document the court failed to give the parties an opportunity to object before the matter was referred to the district judge assigned to the case for final ..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff appears in this action pro and in forma pauperis. On March 7, 2018 this court issued Findings and Recommendations that recommended that several of plaintiff's claims be dismissed, several defendants be dismissed, and supplemental state claims be dismissed. ECF No. 64. In issuing this document the court failed to give the parties an opportunity to object before the matter was referred to the district judge assigned to the case for final action. It will do so now.
In light of the foregoing IT IS HEREBY ORDEERED that:
1. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to file and serve written objections to the court's Findings and Recommendations, if any, to ECF No. 64, dated March 7, 2018, and any such objections should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.
2. Any Reply to the objections shall be served and filed within seven (7) days after service of the objections.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)."
IT IS SO ORDERED.
