Buckhorn v. Hettinger, 15-cv-04352-EMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180126g34
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . On October 13, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, notice of which was served by the Court on Defendant. See Docket No. 63. Plaintiffs served a copy of the Second Amended Complaint on November 8, 2017. See Docket No. 68. Defendant has not filed an answer to date and has not appeared at mandatory status conferences. Defendant is ORDERE
Summary: ORDER TO DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . On October 13, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, notice of which was served by the Court on Defendant. See Docket No. 63. Plaintiffs served a copy of the Second Amended Complaint on November 8, 2017. See Docket No. 68. Defendant has not filed an answer to date and has not appeared at mandatory status conferences. Defendant is ORDERED..
More
ORDER TO DEFENDANT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
On October 13, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, notice of which was served by the Court on Defendant. See Docket No. 63. Plaintiffs served a copy of the Second Amended Complaint on November 8, 2017. See Docket No. 68. Defendant has not filed an answer to date and has not appeared at mandatory status conferences. Defendant is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than February 16, 2018 why the Court should not enter a default for failure to timely answer the Second Amended Complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
