PARKISON v. BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEP'T, CIV S-09-2257 DAD P. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120502933
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: May 01, 2012
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Counsel has also requested that the court continue the law and motion hearing date scheduled in this matter from May 11, 2012, to May 25, 2012. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 48) is granted; 2.
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Counsel for plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Counsel has also requested that the court continue the law and motion hearing date scheduled in this matter from May 11, 2012, to May 25, 2012. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 48) is granted; 2. ..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
Counsel for plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Counsel has also requested that the court continue the law and motion hearing date scheduled in this matter from May 11, 2012, to May 25, 2012.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 48) is granted;
2. Plaintiff's motion for the court to continue the law and motion hearing date scheduled in this matter from May 11, 2012, to May 25, 2012 (Doc. No. 48) is granted; and
3. Plaintiff shall file any opposition papers no later than fifteen (15) days prior to May 25, 2012 law and motion hearing date. Defendants shall file a reply, if any, in accordance with Local Rule 230(d).
Source: Leagle
