Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HODGES v. AKEENA SOLAR, INC., C-09-02147 JW-PSG. (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20110713c81 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 13, 2011
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: NOTICE TO CLASS AND SCHEDULING JAMES WARE, District Judge. WHEREAS, this matter is filed as a class action asserting claims under the federal securities laws (ECF Nos. 1 and 20); WHEREAS, on June 29, 2010, the Court issued an Order establishing various pretrial deadlines and setting a June 27, 2011 Preliminary Pretrial Conference (ECF No. 62); WHEREAS, on March 10, 2011, the Court certified this as a class action covering all persons who purchased or
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: NOTICE TO CLASS AND SCHEDULING

JAMES WARE, District Judge.

WHEREAS, this matter is filed as a class action asserting claims under the federal securities laws (ECF Nos. 1 and 20);

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2010, the Court issued an Order establishing various pretrial deadlines and setting a June 27, 2011 Preliminary Pretrial Conference (ECF No. 62);

WHEREAS, on March 10, 2011, the Court certified this as a class action covering all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Akeena Solar, Inc. between December 26, 2007 and March 13, 2008, ordering that "[o]n or before March 21, 2011, the parties shall file a proposed form of class notice and a joint proposal for dissemination of notice." (ECF No. 121 at 18.);

WHEREAS, on April 4, 2011, the Court approved plaintiffs' unopposed form of class notice, yet found "good cause to postpone dissemination of the class notice for thirty days, to allow the parties to engage in good faith mediation efforts and to provide Defendants sufficient time to seek a stay of proceedings pending its appeal of this Court's Order granting class certification," ordering that "dissemination of the class notice . . . be stayed for thirty days until May 4, 2011." (ECF No. 126 at 2);

WHEREAS, on May 4, 2011, the Court issued an Order again deferring the deadline for dissemination of the class notice until July 18, 2011, both to allow for resolution of Defendants' application for discretionary appeal of its class certification ruling and to afford the parties time to engage in settlement discussions (ECF No. 130);

WHEREAS, on June 21, 2011, the Court issued an Order continuing its Preliminary Pretrial Conference to September 12, 2011, 10:00 a.m. and setting a deadline of September 2, 2011 for the parties to file their "Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement updating the Court on the status of the settlement discussions and Defendants' appeal, and provide a good faith proposed schedule on how this case should proceed." (ECF No. 132);

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal denied Defendants' application for discretionary appeal of class certification;

WHEREAS, on July 1, 2011, Defendants Akeena Solar, Inc. (n/k/a Westinghouse Solar, Inc.), Barry Cinnamon, and Gary Effren retained the firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP to represent them in this matter in the place and stead of the firm of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, LLP;

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a agreement in principal to settle this action; and

WHEREAS, in light of the settlement agreement, the parties do not believe that further pretrial proceedings are necessary and believe that class notice should be provided with the notice of settlement;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, in the interests of judicial economy, hereby agree and stipulate, and the Court hereby orders that:

1) Dissemination of class notice is stayed for an additional seventy-five days, until October 21, 2011, or as otherwise ordered by the Court.

2) The Court's September 12, 2011, 10:00 a.m., Preliminary Pretrial Conference is hereby vacated and no Joint Preliminary Pretrial Conference Statement need be filed by the parties.

3) The Court sets September 12, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., as a hearing on Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement. The parties shall file their Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement in accordance with the Civil Local Rules of Court.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Mary K. Blasy, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from signatory July 12, 2011. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 12th day of July, 2011 at San Diego, California.

Scott+Scott LLP By: ________________________ Mary K. Blasy 707 Broadway, Tenth Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619-233-4565 Facsimile: 619-233-0508 mblasy@scott-scott.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 12, 2011, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I caused the foregoing document or paper to be mailed via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF participants indicated on the Manual Notice List.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 12, 2011.

____________________ Mary K. Blay Scott+Scott LLP 707 Broadway, 10th Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619-233-4565 Fax: 619-233-0508 E-mail: mblasy@scott-scott.com
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer