Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AMERICAN RENA INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION v. LUONG, MC 13-80142 EMC (LB). (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130826564 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 23, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2013
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING RESPONDENT AMY HUYNH LUONG IN CONTEMPT, AND ORDERING SANCTIONS LAUREL BEELER, District Judge. On August 5, 2013 the undersigned issued an order granting Plaintiffs' motion to compel respondent Amy Huynh Luong to appear for deposition and produce documents. See Order, ECF No. 9. The court also denied Plaintiffs' motion for a $5,000 sanction without prejudice, while warning Ms. Luong that sanctions might be appropriate if Ms. Luong did not comply with the Court's or
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING RESPONDENT AMY HUYNH LUONG IN CONTEMPT, AND ORDERING SANCTIONS

LAUREL BEELER, District Judge.

On August 5, 2013 the undersigned issued an order granting Plaintiffs' motion to compel respondent Amy Huynh Luong to appear for deposition and produce documents. See Order, ECF No. 9. The court also denied Plaintiffs' motion for a $5,000 sanction without prejudice, while warning Ms. Luong that sanctions might be appropriate if Ms. Luong did not comply with the Court's order. See id. The court also ordered Ms. Luong to either appear on August 15, 2013 to show cause why she should not be held in contempt or make arrangements for her deposition with Plaintiffs' counsel. See id. Ms. Luong was served with this Order on August 6, 2013. See ECF No. 10, at 2.

On August 15, 2013, Ms. Luong did not appear. See ECF No. 12. This Court gave Ms. Luong one more opportunity to appear "on August 22, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102 to show cause why she should not be held in contempt for her failure to comply with the subpoena and appear for her deposition." See ECF No. 12. Ms. Luong was personally served with this Order on August 16, 2013. See ECF No. 14.

On August 22, 2013, Ms. Luong again did not appear. Moreover, Ms. Luong continues to fail without adequate justification to appear for her deposition and produce documents in compliance with the subpoena or make arrangements for the same with Plaintiffs' counsel. NOW THEREFORE, having considered all of the facts and circumstances of this matter, and in light of the fact that Ms. Luong has now been given more than adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding her contempt, the undersigned hereby finds Ms. Luong in CONTEMPT and GRANTS plaintiffs' request for $5,000 in contempt sanctions as follows:

1. Ms. Luong is hereby found and adjudged to be in CONTEMPT for her failure to comply with Plaintiffs' subpoena served on her on April 10, 2013 (the "Subpoena") and appear for deposition and produce documents in accordance therewith;

2. If Ms. Luong does not purge her contempt by appearing for deposition and producing documents in full compliance with the Subpoena on or before Thursday, September 5, 2013, then starting that day, and continuing every Thursday thereafter until this Court has found that Ms. Luong has purged her contempt, Ms. Luong is hereby fined, adjudged to be liable to Plaintiffs for and ORDERED to pay Plaintiffs, through their counsel, $500.00 for each week that she does not purge her contempt as described above, up to a maximum of $5,000.00 (i.e. $500.00 on September 5, 2013, $500.00 on September 12, 2013, etc.). If the full amount of this $5,000.00 contempt sanction has been exhausted and Ms. Luong has still not purged her contempt, then Plaintiffs may obtain further monetary contempt sanctions against Ms. Luong by submitting further proof of their costs and fees to this Court. The contempt fines and sanctions imposed on Ms. Luong by this provision are self-executing and may be enforced without the need for further judicial intervention.

3. Plaintiffs' counsel is directed to notify the Court immediately when Ms. Luong has purged her contempt by appearing for deposition and producing documents in compliance with the Subpoena.

4. Because Plaintiffs timely moved to enforce the Subpoena and Ms. Luong has continued to fail to appear or produce documents in compliance therewith, this Court views the August 23, 2013 fact discovery cutoff in the underlying action to be tolled as it relates to Ms. Luong's deposition. Ms. Luong must purge her contempt and comply with the Subpoena notwithstanding the August 23, 2013 fact discovery cutoff.

5. The Court sets a status hearing in this matter for September 5, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102, so that the undersigned may be apprised of the current status of Ms. Luong's contempt. Counsel may appear telephonically at this hearing.

6. Plaintiffs' counsel is directed to serve a copy of this order on Ms. Luong and file proof of service with the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer