THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, C 17-05211 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170919768
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER RELATING CASES WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . On September 15, plaintiffs the Regents of the University of California and Janet Napolitano moved to relate State of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 17-cv-05235 MEJ (the "Multi-State Action") to the above-captioned case. Thereafter, all parties in both actions stipulated that the cases should be related. The undersigned judge finds that State of California v. United States Department of Homeland
Summary: ORDER RELATING CASES WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . On September 15, plaintiffs the Regents of the University of California and Janet Napolitano moved to relate State of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 17-cv-05235 MEJ (the "Multi-State Action") to the above-captioned case. Thereafter, all parties in both actions stipulated that the cases should be related. The undersigned judge finds that State of California v. United States Department of Homeland ..
More
ORDER RELATING CASES
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
On September 15, plaintiffs the Regents of the University of California and Janet Napolitano moved to relate State of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 17-cv-05235 MEJ (the "Multi-State Action") to the above-captioned case. Thereafter, all parties in both actions stipulated that the cases should be related.
The undersigned judge finds that State of California v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 17-cv-05235 MEJ is related to the above-captioned case and shall be reassigned to the undersigned judge. The parties are instructed that all future filings in the reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge. Any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect, and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.
A case management conference in both cases will be held on THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 21 AT 10:30 A.M.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
