SIEGEL v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, 5:12-cv-03787 HRL. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130607a64
Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 the parties, by an through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to entry of an order continuing the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") in this matter as set out below. Plaintiff's grounds for seeking this continuance are set out in the Declarations of Counsel filed in this action with this stipulation and on Apr
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 the parties, by an through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to entry of an order continuing the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") in this matter as set out below. Plaintiff's grounds for seeking this continuance are set out in the Declarations of Counsel filed in this action with this stipulation and on Apri..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
HOWARD R. LLOYD, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 the parties, by an through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to entry of an order continuing the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company ("HP") in this matter as set out below. Plaintiff's grounds for seeking this continuance are set out in the Declarations of Counsel filed in this action with this stipulation and on April 4, 2013. Both parties agree to continuance on the grounds that Plaintiff has not completed discovery he wishes to conduct in order to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. In entering into this stipulation Defendant is not waiving any right to subsequently dispute the facts and contentions set out in Plaintiff's April 4, 2013 Motion for Continuance and the related Declaration of Counsel. Specifically, the parties stipulate as follows:
The Motion for Summary Judgment shall be heard at 10:00 AM on Tuesday, July 23 30, 2013; and
Any Opposition by Plaintiff to the Motion for Summary Judgment will be filed and served not later than July 9, 2013; and
Any Reply by Defendant to be filed and served not later than July 16, 2013.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
