U.S. v. WALTERS, 2:12-CR-00375 TLN. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170619792
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT AS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in the government's Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Attachment A to the government's Response to Formal Objections and Sentencing Memorandum shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government and counsel for the defendant.
Summary: ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT AS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in the government's Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Attachment A to the government's Response to Formal Objections and Sentencing Memorandum shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government and counsel for the defendant. ..
More
ORDER SEALING DOCUMENT AS SET FORTH IN GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in the government's Request to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Attachment A to the government's Response to Formal Objections and Sentencing Memorandum shall be SEALED until further order of this Court.
It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government and counsel for the defendant.
The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publ'g Co. v. United States Dist. Court, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990), and progeny. The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in the government's Request to Seal, sealing Attachment A to to the government's Response to Formal Objections and Sentencing Memorandum serves a compelling interest. The Court further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by the government would be harmed. Finally, the Court further finds that there are no additional alternatives to sealing Attachment A to the government's Response to Formal Objections and Sentencing Memorandum that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the government.
Source: Leagle
