Shockency v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02427-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180601b26
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 31, 2018
Latest Update: May 31, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from June 4, 2018 to July 5, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel has
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from June 4, 2018 to July 5, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel has ..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from June 4, 2018 to July 5, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel has a higher than normal workload. In addition, Defendant's counsel was out of the office from May 24 to May 29.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
