(PC) Barkley v. California Correctional Health Care Services,, 2:16-cv-1386 MCE CKD P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180108546
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . On December 18, 2017, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed December 5, 2017, denying plaintiff's motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . On December 18, 2017, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed December 5, 2017, denying plaintiff's motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. T..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
On December 18, 2017, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed December 5, 2017, denying plaintiff's motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed December 5, 2017, is affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
