H Sheff B Sheff-Meiselman K Sheff David Sheff Family Trust U/A DTD 09/06/201 ex rel. Gopro, Inc. v. Woodman, 17-cv-06504-CW. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180226812
Filed: Feb. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Dkt. No. 4, 27, 33) CLAUDIA WILKEN , District Judge . On February 22, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This is a shareholder derivative action. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1(c) and 41(a)(1)(A), it may not be voluntarily dismissed without the Court's approval. The Court construes Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a motion fo
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Dkt. No. 4, 27, 33) CLAUDIA WILKEN , District Judge . On February 22, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This is a shareholder derivative action. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1(c) and 41(a)(1)(A), it may not be voluntarily dismissed without the Court's approval. The Court construes Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a motion for..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(Dkt. No. 4, 27, 33)
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
On February 22, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). This is a shareholder derivative action. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1(c) and 41(a)(1)(A), it may not be voluntarily dismissed without the Court's approval.
The Court construes Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a motion for dismissal without prejudice. So construed, the motion (Docket No. 33) is GRANTED in light of the early stage of this litigation and the issues raised in Defendants' pending motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens and ripeness grounds. This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's motion to seal (Docket No. 4), see Civil L.R. 79-5(f)(2), and Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 27).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
