Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Deatrick v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., 3:13-cv-5016 JST. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150807839 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiffs Michael Deatrick, the Opt-in Plaintiffs, and Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. ("Securitas USA") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, the parties submitted a STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND VACATING MOTION DATES [ECF 140] on June 16, 2015, informing that Court that they had reached agreement on the general terms of settlement in this action. W
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT

Plaintiffs Michael Deatrick, the Opt-in Plaintiffs, and Defendant Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. ("Securitas USA") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the parties submitted a STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND VACATING MOTION DATES [ECF 140] on June 16, 2015, informing that Court that they had reached agreement on the general terms of settlement in this action.

WHEREAS, the Court accepted the Parties' stipulation and ordered [ECF 141] that a motion for approval be submitted by August 7, 2015.

WHEREAS, the parties have been working diligently to negotiate additional necessary terms and finalize a settlement agreement.

WHEREAS, due to the number and complexity of issues the parties require additional time to document the settlement and submit a motion for approval.

The Parties THEREFORE STIPULATE, AGREE AND REQUEST AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the Court continue the current deadline of August 7, 2015, for the Plaintiffs to file a motion for conditional certification of a settlement class or classes and for preliminary approval of settlement to August 21, 2015.

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the undersigned filer of this document hereby attests that concurrence in the filing has been obtained from each of the other signatories, which shall serve in lieu of their signatures on the document.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer