Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dunham v. Najem, 18-CV-04467 EDL. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190412863 Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE , District Judge . WHEREAS, the Court set April 22, 2019 as the last day for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 36); WHEREAS, Plaintiff propounded Requests for Production of Documents on or about March 14, 2019 seeking extensive documents concerning the operations of the Monterey County Jail, as well as the custody records of Mr. Dunham; WHEREAS, Defendants have begun gath
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

WHEREAS, the Court set April 22, 2019 as the last day for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 36);

WHEREAS, Plaintiff propounded Requests for Production of Documents on or about March 14, 2019 seeking extensive documents concerning the operations of the Monterey County Jail, as well as the custody records of Mr. Dunham;

WHEREAS, Defendants have begun gathering the documents requested by Plaintiffs. Due to a change in staffing at the Monterey County Sheriff's Office, Defendants are still in the process of gathering the responsive documents requested by Plaintiff and need an additional 30 days to complete the gathering of said documents and review of those documents for disclosability prior to making them available to Plaintiff;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff needs to review said documents before filing an amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their counsel of record:

1. Defendants will have through May 15, 2019 to respond to the Request for Production of Documents propounded by Plaintiff; 2. Plaintiff shall have through May 29, 2019 to file an amended complaint in this matter; 3. All other dates currently set in this matter shall not change. Dated: April 10, 2019 CHARLES J. McKEE County Counsel By: /s/Michael R. Philippi MICHAEL R. PHILIPPI, Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants, A. NAJEM; J. N. SULLIVAN; Z. D. SWIFT; J.D. GARDEPIE; D.E. VARGAS; J. HOLLOWAY; and S. H. ANADON, Dated: April 10, 2019 PICCUTA LAW GROUP, LLP By: /s/Charles Tony Piccuta CHARLES TONY PICCUTA Attorney for Plaintiff John F. Dunham

IT IS ORDERED that the forgoing Stipulation is approved.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer