Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PALMER v. CITY OF SANTA MONICA, 15-CV-06183-SJO-JC. (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20161027b03 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Based on the STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE entered into by the parties, Plaintiff, JUSTIN PALMER, and Defendants, OFFICER R. FUJITA and OFFFICER E. NAVARRO, as well as previously dismissed defendants, CITY OF SANTA MONICA and CHIEF OF POLICE JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the within action be dismissed with
More

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Based on the STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE entered into by the parties, Plaintiff, JUSTIN PALMER, and Defendants, OFFICER R. FUJITA and OFFFICER E. NAVARRO, as well as previously dismissed defendants, CITY OF SANTA MONICA and CHIEF OF POLICE JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the within action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with neither party to pay any additional costs and attorney's fees, including attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988, other than as covered by, and agreed to, in the Mutual Release of All Claims, fully executed by the parties on October 17, 2016, the Court hereby orders as follows:

The within action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with neither party to pay any additional costs and attorney's fees, including attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988, other than as covered by, and agreed to in, the Mutual Release of All Claims, fully executed by the parties on October 17, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer