Sellers v. Berryhill, 2:17-CV-01678-AC. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180220f22
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 7 Days to March 12, 2018, for Plaintiff to file her Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's second and final request for an extension. It is requested due to the fact that Plaintiff's counsel has a large backlog
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 7 Days to March 12, 2018, for Plaintiff to file her Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's second and final request for an extension. It is requested due to the fact that Plaintiff's counsel has a large backlog ..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 7 Days to March 12, 2018, for Plaintiff to file her Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court's Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff's second and final request for an extension. It is requested due to the fact that Plaintiff's counsel has a large backlog in her workload and requires an additional week to adequately address this case. Plaintiff's counsel apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause to the Court or to the Defendant.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
