In re Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, 3:10-md-02143-RS-JCS (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170908913
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc. ("Ingram") and Defendants Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc., Koninklijke Philips N.V., and Lite-On IT Corporation of Taiwan (collectively "PLDS"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to PLDS with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of t
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD G. SEEBORG , District Judge . Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc. ("Ingram") and Defendants Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc., Koninklijke Philips N.V., and Lite-On IT Corporation of Taiwan (collectively "PLDS"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to PLDS with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of th..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RICHARD G. SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ingram Micro Inc. ("Ingram") and Defendants Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions Corporation, Philips & Lite-On Digital Solutions USA, Inc., Koninklijke Philips N.V., and Lite-On IT Corporation of Taiwan (collectively "PLDS"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to a dismissal of this action as to PLDS with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims of Ingram against any other defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FILER ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Rule 5-1(i)(3) of the Local Rules of Practice in Civil Proceedings Before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, I, Daniel A. Sasse, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
