Jacobsen v. Curran, 1:16-cv-01050-LJO-JDP (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180510859
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 09, 2018
Latest Update: May 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 75) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Michael Neil Jacobsen ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 6, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng entered findings and recommendations, recommending that: 1. De
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 75) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Michael Neil Jacobsen ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 6, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng entered findings and recommendations, recommending that: 1. Def..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 75)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
Michael Neil Jacobsen ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 6, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng entered findings and recommendations, recommending that:
1. Defendant Curran's motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 38) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be granted in part;
a. Summary judgment be entered in favor of Defendant Curran;
b. Defendant Curran's motion for summary judgment be denied as to all other defendants; and
2. Defendant [Dulces] Gonzalez's motion for summary judgment and, alternatively, for judgment on the pleadings, (ECF No. 35) be denied.
(ECF No. 75.) The parties were given an opportunity to object to the findings and recommendations within fourteen days. Defendant Dulces Gonzales filed objection on April 11, 2018. (ECF No. 76.) Plaintiff filed his objections on April 27, 2018. (ECF No. 79).
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on April 6, 2018, (ECF No. 75), are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Defendant Curran's motion for summary judgment (ECF Nos. 38) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is granted in part, as follows:
a. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendant Curran;
b. Defendant Curran's motion for summary judgment is denied as to all other defendants;
3. Defendant Dulces Gonzalez's motion for summary judgment and, alternatively, for judgment on the pleadings, (ECF No. 35) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
