Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HODGES v. AKEENA SOLAR, INC., C-09-02147 JW. (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20110822760 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 22, 2011
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2011
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JAMES WARE, District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants in the above-captioned action, by their undersigned attorneys, stipulate as follows and request that the Court enter the order set out below: 1. The parties previously advised the Court that they have reached an agreement in principle to resolve this matter, and the Court set a hearing date of September 12,
More

STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

JAMES WARE, District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants in the above-captioned action, by their undersigned attorneys, stipulate as follows and request that the Court enter the order set out below:

1. The parties previously advised the Court that they have reached an agreement in principle to resolve this matter, and the Court set a hearing date of September 12, 2011 for preliminary approval of the settlement and proposed notice procedures;

2. On August 4, 2011, the parties requested and on August 5, 2011, the Court granted, a brief extension until August 19, 2011 to file the unopposed motion for preliminary approval of the settlement;

3. Counsel for the parties have been working diligently to finalize the stipulation of settlement and believe all differences have been resolved, but require a few additional days to obtain final approval of all parties;

3. The parties still anticipate that the motion for preliminary approval will be unopposed; and

4. The parties do not seek to change the September 12, 2011 hearing date, but do require a few additional days to obtain all parties' final approval of the stipulation of settlement.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to approval by the Court, and pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, that the Stipulation of Settlement and motion for preliminary approval shall be filed on or before Wednesday, August 24, 2011.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

I, Mary K. Blasy, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from signatory August 19, 2011. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 19th day of August, 2011, at San Diego, California.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer