HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE v. U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION AND NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, 3:16-cv-04294-WHO. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161014c63
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 13, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to the Case Management Conference Order (DN 19), Plaintiff Hoopa Valley Tribe, Defendants U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and National Marine Fisheries Service ("Federal Defendants"), and Defendant-Intervenors Klamath Water Users Association, Sunnyside Irrigation District, and Ben DuVal hereby agree and stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter in light of the
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to the Case Management Conference Order (DN 19), Plaintiff Hoopa Valley Tribe, Defendants U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and National Marine Fisheries Service ("Federal Defendants"), and Defendant-Intervenors Klamath Water Users Association, Sunnyside Irrigation District, and Ben DuVal hereby agree and stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter in light of the ..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Case Management Conference Order (DN 19), Plaintiff Hoopa Valley Tribe, Defendants U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and National Marine Fisheries Service ("Federal Defendants"), and Defendant-Intervenors Klamath Water Users Association, Sunnyside Irrigation District, and Ben DuVal hereby agree and stipulate to continue the Case Management Conference in the above-captioned matter in light of the filing (on October 5, 2016) of Federal Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay ("motion" (DN 33)).1 The instant stipulation is timely under the Case Management Conference Order (i.e., made "not less than ten days before the conference date"), and good cause exists therefore because Federal Defendants' motion, if granted, could narrow the existing dispute, if not eliminate it altogether. DN 19 at 2 ¶ 1(d).
WHEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate to continue the existing November 1, 2016 Case Management Conference date until 14 days after final resolution of Federal Defendants' motion (DN 33), should any Case Management Conference be necessary at that time.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Prior to the filing of Federal Defendants' motion, the parties stipulated (on September 30, 2016 (DN 28)) to continue the Case Management Conference from the originally-scheduled date of October 12, 2016 to the current date of November 1, 2016 due to a scheduling conflict of undersigned counsel for Federal Defendants on October 12.
Source: Leagle
