Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 3:07-md-01827-SI (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130614a78 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 31, 2013
Latest Update: May 31, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFF; TIME TO MEET AND CONFER AND/OR FILE MOTIONS TO COMPEL SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. Direct Action Plaintiffs MetroPCS Wireless, Inc.; Office Depot, Inc.; Interbond Corporation of America; Schultze Agency Services, LLC; P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation; MARTA Cooperative of America, Inc.; ABC Appliance, Inc.; Tech Data Corporation and Tech Data Product Management, Inc.; The AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust, by and thro
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY CUTOFF; TIME TO MEET AND CONFER AND/OR FILE MOTIONS TO COMPEL

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Direct Action Plaintiffs MetroPCS Wireless, Inc.; Office Depot, Inc.; Interbond Corporation of America; Schultze Agency Services, LLC; P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation; MARTA Cooperative of America, Inc.; ABC Appliance, Inc.; Tech Data Corporation and Tech Data Product Management, Inc.; The AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust, by and through Kenneth A. Welt, Liquidating Trustee; CompuCom Systems, Inc.; and NECO Alliance LLC (collectively, "Direct Action Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., and CMO Japan Co., Ltd. (collectively "Chi Mei Defendants" and together with Direct Action Plaintiffs, the "Parties") stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS the Parties have previously stipulated to, and the Court has approved, the extension of dates set in the Court's Orders re Pretrial and Trial Schedule (MDL Dkt. No. 7665) ("Track 2 Scheduling Stipulation");

WHEREAS the Track 2 Scheduling Stipulation extended the close of fact discovery to May 17, 2013;

WHEREAS on April 12, 2013 Direct Action Plaintiffs served their First Set of Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Admission to Chi Mei Defendants (the "Discovery");

WHEREAS Chi Mei Defendants served responses to the Discovery on May 16, 2013;

WHEREAS the Parties have endeavored to meet and confer regarding Chi Mei Defendants' responses to the Discovery;

WHEREAS the Parties previously stipulated to extend the period to meet and confer regarding Chi Mei Defendants' responses to the Discovery and/or for Direct Action Plaintiffs to file a motion to compel regarding Chi Mei Defendants' responses to the Discovery

WHEREAS additional time is needed to meet and confer regarding Chi Mei Defendants' responses to the Discovery;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and agree as follows:

The period for Chi Mei Defendants and Direct Action Plaintiffs to meet and confer regarding Chi Mei Defendants' responses to the Discovery and/or for Direct Action Plaintiffs to file a motion to compel regarding Chi Mei Defendants' responses to the Discovery is extended to June 7, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from stipulating defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer