Filed: Mar. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Collateral Analytics, LLC ("Collateral Analytics") and Defendants Nationstar Mortgage LLC ("Nationstar"), Xome Settlement Services, LLC ("Xome") and Quantarium, LLC ("Quantarium") (collectively, "Defendants") stipulate and request that the Court enter an or
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Collateral Analytics, LLC ("Collateral Analytics") and Defendants Nationstar Mortgage LLC ("Nationstar"), Xome Settlement Services, LLC ("Xome") and Quantarium, LLC ("Quantarium") (collectively, "Defendants") stipulate and request that the Court enter an ord..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Collateral Analytics, LLC ("Collateral Analytics") and Defendants Nationstar Mortgage LLC ("Nationstar"), Xome Settlement Services, LLC ("Xome") and Quantarium, LLC ("Quantarium") (collectively, "Defendants") stipulate and request that the Court enter an order granting Plaintiff a short, one-week extension of time, or until March 19, 2018, to file its opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint.
In support of the parties' stipulated request, the parties state as follows:
1. On January 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint against Defendants and served the Complaint on Defendant Nationstar and Xome on January 4, 2018 and Defendant Quantarium on January 5, 2018.
2. On January 19, 2018, Defendants filed the parties' stipulation to extend Defendants' time to respond to the Complaint to February 26, 2018.
3. On February 26, 2018, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Counts 1-9 and 11 of the Complaint with a hearing date set by the Court for April 19, 2018. Defendants also filed the parties' stipulation to extend the time for Defendants to respond to Count 10 of the Complaint to fourteen days after the Court rules on their motion to dismiss.
4. Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss is currently due on March 12, 2018.
5. At the request of Plaintiff, the parties have met and conferred and jointly agree, for the convenience of the parties, to the requested one-week extension.
6. The above change will only alter the deadline by which Defendants must file their reply brief in further support of their motion to dismiss, moving it to March 26, 2018. It will not otherwise alter the date of any other event or deadline already fixed by Court order, including the April 19, 2018 hearing date.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint will be due on March 19, 2018.
FILER'S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Lauren E. Kapsky, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
