MELGAR v. ZICAM LLC, 2:14-cv-00160-MCE-AC. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20151216a46
Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT TESTIMONY MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Having considered Defendants' Notice of Request, Request to Seal Motion, and the Parties' Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 17), this Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' Request to Seal documents filed in support of Defendants' replies in suppo
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT TESTIMONY MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Having considered Defendants' Notice of Request, Request to Seal Motion, and the Parties' Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 17), this Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' Request to Seal documents filed in support of Defendants' replies in suppor..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT TESTIMONY
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Having considered Defendants' Notice of Request, Request to Seal Motion, and the Parties' Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 17), this Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' Request to Seal documents filed in support of Defendants' replies in support of summary judgment and motions to exclude Plaintiff's expert testimony.
The Court finds and orders the following references be filed under seal:
• Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative Summary Adjudication, at i:6, 1:3-5, 1:8-10, 1:25, 2:1, 2:8-9, 2:11, 2:15-17, 3:1-4:11, 4:14, 4:23-24, 5:2-11, 6:1-12, 6:20-21, 6:23-28, 7:23-26, 10:1-2.
• Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Separate Statement of Disputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, at pp. 2-46.
• Defendants' Objections to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Separate Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, at 3:4-18, 3:22-27, 4:3-9, 4:24-28, 5:3-27:19, 27:26-28, 28:3-4.
• Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Plaintiff's Designated Expert Noel R. Rose, M.D., Ph.D., at 2:10, 7:17-18, 7:25-9:6, 9:23-24.
• Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Exclude Certain Opinion Testimony of Plaintiff's Designated Expert R. Barker Bausell, Ph.D., at 2:6, 7:15-16, 7:25-9:10, 9:27-28, 10:4-7.
• Exhibit BB to the Declaration of William A. Hanssen, the Deposition of R. Eccles, B.Sc., Ph.D., D.Sc., taken on June 16, 2015, at pp. 135-136, 138-141, 145-148, 168, 176-179, 181-184, 188-189.
• Exhibit CC to the Declaration of William A. Hanssen, the Deposition of Susan E. Potts, taken on April 1, 2015, at pp. 122-123, 127-128.
• Exhibit DD to the Declaration of William A. Hanssen, Deposition of Noel R. Rose, M.D., Ph.D., taken on April 24, 2015 and May 12, 2015, at pp. 40-66, 68, 72-75, 78-79, 98-102, 106-108, 110-111, 145, 248-252, 258-262.
• Exhibit EE to the Declaration of William A. Hanssen, Deposition of R. Barker Bausell, Ph.D., taken on April 17, 2015, at pp. 54-56, 81, 85-86, 98-100, 141, 144-146.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
