Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Heavy Machinery Performa Akira Seiki Date 2000, 2:14-MC-00089-MCE-EFB. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140923948 Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and potential claimants Dean Wilson and Lisa Wilson ("claimants"), by and through their respective attorneys, as follows: 1. On or about March 25, 2014, claimants filed a claim in the administrative forfeiture proceeding with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacc
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and potential claimants Dean Wilson and Lisa Wilson ("claimants"), by and through their respective attorneys, as follows:

1. On or about March 25, 2014, claimants filed a claim in the administrative forfeiture proceeding with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives ("ATF") with respect to the Heavy Machinery listed above (hereafter "defendant properties"), which were seized on or about October 9, 2013.

2. The ATF has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any person to file a claim to the defendant properties under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than claimants has filed a claim to the defendant properties as required by law in the administrative forfeiture proceeding.

3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceeding, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. That deadline was June 23, 2014.

4. By Stipulation and Order filed June 25, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to September 22, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

5. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further extend to December 22, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

6. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to December 22, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer