Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FERGUSON v. COLVIN, 13-cv-03495-AP. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20140507905 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 06, 2014
Latest Update: May 06, 2014
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Michael W. Seckar 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 719-543-8403 (facsimile) seckarlaw@mindspring.com For Defendant: John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict Garc a Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov James Burgess JAMES BURGESS Special Assistant United States Attorney O
More

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff: Michael W. Seckar 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 719-543-8403 (facsimile) seckarlaw@mindspring.com For Defendant: John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict García Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov James Burgess JAMES BURGESS Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 Telephone: 303-844-1856 James.burgess@ssa.gov

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: December 26, 2013 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: February 20, 2104 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: April 14, 2014

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of her knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate. To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

This case is not an appeal from a decision issued on remand. The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The parties request a briefing schedule two weeks outside of the standard briefing schedule to account for a large number of cases.

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: June 16, 2014 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: July 31, 2014 C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: August 15, 2014

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Indicate below the parties' consent choice.

A. (X) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. () All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer