Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. APPROXIMATELY $84,359.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, 2:15-mc-00036-MCE-DAD. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151224729 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and potential claimant David Allen Smith ("claimant"), by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. On or about February 17, 2015, the Citrus Heights Police Department seized the above-referenced defendant properties 1 as part of a joint
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE

It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and potential claimant David Allen Smith ("claimant"), by and through their respective counsel, as follows:

1. On or about February 17, 2015, the Citrus Heights Police Department seized the above-referenced defendant properties1 as part of a joint investigation with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

2. Under 18 U.S.C. §§ 983(a)(1)(A)(iv) and 983 (a)(3)(A), the United States is required to send notice to potential claimants, file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties, and/or obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture within ninety days of seizure by the State or local law enforcement agency, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. That deadline was May 18, 2015.

3. By Stipulation and Order filed April 29, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend to July 17, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

4. By Stipulation and Order filed July 29, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend to October 15, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

5. By Stipulation and Order filed October 21, 2015, the parties stipulated to extend to December 14, 2015, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

6. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further extend to March 14, 2016, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture.

7. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant properties and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant properties are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to March 14, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The United States learned that a total of $83,221.35 was seized from David Smith, rather than the $84,359.00 identified in the caption. In addition, the United States decided not to file against the 2013 Chevrolet Camaro SS, 2009 Harley Davidson, and 2004 Cadillac XLR identified in the caption.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer