MULHALL v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 16-cv-01841-DMR. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160620707
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT Re: Dkt. No. 15 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The court is in receipt of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. [Docket No. 15.] Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Plaintiff properly filed a First Amended Complaint on June 8, 2016. Order Approving Stipulation Extending Deadline to File Amended Complaint [Docket No. 17]; First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 18]. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. The June 30, 2
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT Re: Dkt. No. 15 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The court is in receipt of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. [Docket No. 15.] Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Plaintiff properly filed a First Amended Complaint on June 8, 2016. Order Approving Stipulation Extending Deadline to File Amended Complaint [Docket No. 17]; First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 18]. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. The June 30, 20..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT
Re: Dkt. No. 15
DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.
The court is in receipt of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. [Docket No. 15.] Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Plaintiff properly filed a First Amended Complaint on June 8, 2016. Order Approving Stipulation Extending Deadline to File Amended Complaint [Docket No. 17]; First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 18]. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. The June 30, 2016 hearing is hereby vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle