Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BOYLE, CR-S-13-332-GEB. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20151209a29 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2015
Summary: AGREEMENT AND STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES REGARDING CONTINUING THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING DATE TO FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 2016 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, Mr. Todd A. Pickles, and defendant Tina Marie Bini by and through her counsel of record, Ms. Candace A. Fry, and Matthew Boyle by and through his counsel of record, Mr. James R. Greiner, hereby agree and stipulate as follo
More

AGREEMENT AND STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES REGARDING CONTINUING THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING DATE TO FRIDAY, JANUARY 22, 2016 AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, Mr. Todd A. Pickles, and defendant Tina Marie Bini by and through her counsel of record, Ms. Candace A. Fry, and Matthew Boyle by and through his counsel of record, Mr. James R. Greiner, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1 &mdash By previous order (See Docket number 80) this matter was set for Judgment and Sentencing on Friday, December 11, 2015, as to both defendants; 2 — By this agreement and stipulation, both the government and both the defendants now move to continue the Judgment and Sentencing to Friday, January 22, 2016. 3 — The United States joins in this request. 4. This gives the defense sufficient time to monitor whether Congress will pass any legislation effecting the Advisory Sentencing Guidelines. This will allow all parties to monitor Congress and then the government needs time to file documents with the Court and the defense will need more time once those documents are filed to review them, discuss them with their respective clients and file, if needed, any documents with the Court.

The parties have given authority to James R. Greiner to sign on their behalf.

IT IS SO AGREED TO AND SO STIPULATED TO;

ORDER

Since the parties agree to continue the Judgment and Sentencing to January 22, 2016, commencing at 9:00 a.m., Judgment and Sentencing is rescheduled as requested. However, notwithstanding the parties' stipulated reasons for this rescheduling, those reasons are not adopted as a basis for this rescheduling.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer