BRANSON v. PRICE, 13-cv-03090-REB-BNB. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20160120906
Visitors: 32
Filed: Jan. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . The matter is before me on the Stipulation for Substitution of Party and Dismissal of Defendant [#110] 1 filed January 15, 2016. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation for Substitution of Party and Dismissal of Defendant is approved; 2. That the plaintiff's claims against defendant Commerce City Police Officer R
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . The matter is before me on the Stipulation for Substitution of Party and Dismissal of Defendant [#110] 1 filed January 15, 2016. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation for Substitution of Party and Dismissal of Defendant is approved; 2. That the plaintiff's claims against defendant Commerce City Police Officer Ro..
More
ORDER
ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
The matter is before me on the Stipulation for Substitution of Party and Dismissal of Defendant [#110]1 filed January 15, 2016. After careful review of the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation for Substitution of Party and Dismissal of Defendant is approved;
2. That the plaintiff's claims against defendant Commerce City Police Officer Robert Price are dismissed with prejudice with the affected parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs;
3. That the City of Commerce City is substituted in place of Commerce City Police Officer Robert Price as the named defendant in this action; and
4. That the caption shall be amended to remove Commerce City Police Officer Robert Price as the defendant and to substitute the City of Commerce City as the named defendant.
FootNotes
1. "[#110]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source: Leagle
