Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Kao Xiong, 2:17-MJ-00216 DB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180615a39 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER (PROPOSED) EXTENDING TIME FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, Kao Xiong, that the preliminary hearing scheduled for June 21, 2018, may be continued to August 15, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. Mr. Xiong first appeared on the complaint on December 22, 2017. At the time, with Mr. Xiong's consent, the parties opted to consider resolving t
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER (PROPOSED) EXTENDING TIME FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING AND EXCLUDING TIME

It is hereby stipulated and agreed between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant, Kao Xiong, that the preliminary hearing scheduled for June 21, 2018, may be continued to August 15, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.

Mr. Xiong first appeared on the complaint on December 22, 2017. At the time, with Mr. Xiong's consent, the parties opted to consider resolving the case without an indictment and agreed to continue the preliminary examination for that reason. The parties continue to agree that ongoing investigation constitutes good cause to extend the time limits set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1, taking into consideration the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases, which the parties believe will be promoted by extending the time. The parties further ask the Court to enter an order excluding time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (Local Code T4), to afford both parties reasonable time to investigate and prepare.

ORDER

The Court finds good cause in the reasons set forth above to continue the preliminary hearing to August 15, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. Also for the reasons stated by the parties, the Court orders time under the Speedy Trial Act excluded through August 15, 2018, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer