Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ARMSTRONG v. U.S., 14-cv-02602-YGR. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141010c18 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge. On September 10, 2014, Defendant United States of America filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") . (Dkt. No. 15.) Plaintiff's response was due September 24, 2014. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). To date Ms. Armstrong has failed to oppose the Motion to Dismiss. Ms. Armstrong is hereby ORDERED to file any opposition to the pending Motion to Dismiss no later than October 17, 2014. Failure to
More

ORDER RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.

On September 10, 2014, Defendant United States of America filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint ("Motion to Dismiss") . (Dkt. No. 15.) Plaintiff's response was due September 24, 2014. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). To date Ms. Armstrong has failed to oppose the Motion to Dismiss.

Ms. Armstrong is hereby ORDERED to file any opposition to the pending Motion to Dismiss no later than October 17, 2014. Failure to file an opposition to the Motion by that date will result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Any reply to an opposition must be filed and served not more than 7 days after the opposition is served and filed. Civ. L.R. 7-3(c). Defendant shall immediately file a Statement of Non-Opposition pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-3(b) if Ms. Armstrong fails to file her oppositions by the above deadline.

The hearing date of October 28, 2014 is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer