Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mendez v. C-Two Group, Inc., 3:13-cv-05914-EMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140429a66 Visitors: 25
Filed: Apr. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Plaintiff Jamie Mendez and Defendant C-Two Group, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this Action in state court on November 5, 2013; WHEREAS, the Summons and Complaint were served on Defendants on November 21, 2014; WHEREAS, Defendan
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Plaintiff Jamie Mendez and Defendant C-Two Group, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this Action in state court on November 5, 2013;

WHEREAS, the Summons and Complaint were served on Defendants on November 21, 2014;

WHEREAS, Defendants removed this Action to this Court on December 20, 2013;

WHEREAS, this Action was assigned to this Court on January 9, 2014;

WHEREAS, on March 11, 2014, this Court scheduled the Case Management Conference for May 15, 2014;

WHEREAS, Defendant C-Two Group, Inc. filed an Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Class Action Complaint on March 14, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Court's Minutes from Defendant MobileStorm's Motion to Dismiss advises the parties that the Court intends to discuss ADR options at the Case Management Conference currently set for May 15, 2014;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the discussions between counsel, Plaintiff believes that it is necessary to add additional parties that may be liable for some or all of Plaintiff's allegations in the First Amended Class Action Complaint;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff is currently investigating the identities of all other potential parties to this case in order to properly bring them before the Court prior to the Case Management Conference;

WHEREAS, it is Plaintiff's belief that any discussion of ADR will be more productive with all potentially liable parties before the Court;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 and the Court's Civil Standing Order that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for May 15, 2014 shall be continued for 63 days, to Thursday, July 24, 2014 at 9:30 a.m.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer