Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TROUDT v. ORACLE CORPORATION, 1:16-cv-00175-REB-CBS. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20160502974 Visitors: 21
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF HARD COPY DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION CRAIG B. SHAFFER , Magistrate Judge . Upon the parties' joint motion (Doc. 47), the court approves and adopts as an order of the court, the parties' attached Stipulation (originally filed at Doc. 47-1) for Discovery of Hard Copy Documents and Electronically Stored Information. So ORDERED. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00175-REB-CBS DEBORAH TROUDT
More

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF HARD COPY DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

Upon the parties' joint motion (Doc. 47), the court approves and adopts as an order of the court, the parties' attached Stipulation (originally filed at Doc. 47-1) for Discovery of Hard Copy Documents and Electronically Stored Information.

So ORDERED.

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00175-REB-CBS DEBORAH TROUDT, BRAD STAUF, SUSAN CUTSFORTH, WAYNE SELTZER, MICHAEL HARKIN, MIRIAM WAGNER, and MICHAEL FOY, individually and as representatives of a class of plan participants, on behalf of the Oracle Corporation 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan Plaintiffs, v. ORACLE CORPORATION, ORACLE CORPORATION 401(K) COMMITTEE, and JOHN DOES 1-20 Defendants.

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF HARD COPY DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

The Parties to the above-captioned action HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, by and through their undersigned counsel, that the following specifications shall govern discovery of all documents, electronically stored information ("ESI"), and any other materials and information produced by the Parties during discovery.

I. General

A. The Parties shall take reasonable steps to comply with the procedures set forth in this Stipulation.

B. To the extent reasonably possible, the production of documents shall be conducted to maximize efficient and quick access to documents and minimize related discovery costs. The terms of this Stipulation shall be construed so as to ensure the prompt, efficient, and cost-effective exchange of information consistent with the Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and any orders by this Court.

1. Except as specifically limited herein, this Stipulation governs the production of discoverable documents by the Parties during the litigation.

2. This Stipulation shall not enlarge, reduce, or otherwise affect the scope of discovery in this litigation as imposed by the Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court's orders, nor imply that discovery produced under the terms of this Stipulation is properly discoverable, relevant, or admissible in this or in any other litigation.

3. Subject to this Stipulation, the Parties' objections and responses to requests for production of documents and interrogatories, and the Agreed Protective Order on Confidentiality to be later entered by the Court, all documents that are responsive to discovery requests, are reasonably accessible, and that meet the proportionality factors set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b), shall be produced in the manner provided herein. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be interpreted to require disclosure of materials that a Party contends are not discoverable or are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other privilege that may be applicable. Additionally, nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be deemed to waive or limit any Party's right to object to (and on that basis withhold) the production of documents or electronically stored information, or to seek relief from the production of certain documents or electronically stored information, or to move for protective order on the ground that the sources are not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost, or move to compel on the ground that there is good cause for the documents' production.

4. The Parties agree to promptly alert all other Parties concerning any technical problems associated with complying with this Stipulation. To the extent the Producing Party determine that compliance with this Stipulation imposes an undue burden or is not proportional with respect to any protocol, source, or search term listed herein, the Parties shall promptly confer in an effort to resolve the issue.

5. Consistent with their obligations, the Parties will attempt to resolve, in person, in writing (including e-mail), or by telephone, disputes regarding the issues set forth herein prior to filing a motion with the Court, or otherwise seeking relief. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute after a good faith effort, the Parties may seek Court intervention in accordance with the Court's procedures.

II. Production Format — Hard Copy

Hard copy documents that have not been scanned by the Producing Party may be produced as an exact hard copy, other than hard copy documents maintained at an off-site location that will be separately negotiated by the Parties. At the Producing Party's election, or if hard copy documents have already been scanned by the Producing Party, hard copy documents will be scanned and produced as either PDF or single-page, black and white, Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with an .opt image cross-reference file and a delimited database load file (i.e., .dat). The database load file shall contain the metadata fields listed in the attached Appendix A. The Parties will discuss reasonable requests for production of color or oversized documents on a document-by-document or category-by-category basis.

In scanning hard copy documents, multiple distinct documents should be scanned as they are maintained and stored in the ordinary course. The Producing Party shall provide OCR text for hard copy documents scanned for production. OCR is to be performed on a document level and provided in document-level *.txt files named to match the production number of the first page of the document to which the OCR text corresponds. In the case of an organized compilation of separate documents — for example, a binder containing several separate documents behind numbered tabs — the document behind each tab should be scanned separately, but the relationship among the documents in the binder should be reflected in the metadata fields.

III. Production Format — Electronically Stored Information ("ESI")

Except as otherwise noted herein or agreed on by the Parties, and notwithstanding any format provisions in a Party's discovery requests, ESI will generally be produced in conformance with the specifications detailed in Appendix A. ESI shall be produced in tiff + metadata format, except for Excel files, Word files, PowerPoint files, and .pdf files, which shall be produced in native format, as specified in this Stipulation and Appendix A. In addition, all ESI will be produced with a delimited database load file containing the metadata fields listed in Appendix A and captured at the time of the collection. Any Party, in addition to producing designated ESI in native format, may produce ESI in a TIFF + metadata format as specified in Appendix A. The Parties will discuss reasonable requests for production of color or oversized documents on a document-by-document or category-by-category basis. The parties agree to meet and confer as to whether the Producing Party is required to produce files other than those set forth in this paragraph in native format.

IV. Production Format — Structured Data Sources

To the extent discoverable electronic information is contained in structured data sources, the Parties will meet and confer to discuss the most appropriate and cost-effective production format, which may include an export of data or the creation of a report. There is no obligation for a Party to create reports in a format not already available in the structured data source.

V. Production Format — Media

Documents shall be exchanged on DVD-ROMs, CD-ROMs, USB drives, portable hard drives, through secure file transfer protocols (e.g., SFTP), or similar secure electronic transmission as agreed to by the Parties. The production media shall be labeled with the Volume Number along with the Bates Number range(s) of the materials, and where not practicable to do so, may be provided in an accompanying letter.

Any document production that may contain "non-public personal information" or confidential health information (as defined in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA") Privacy Rule and/or other applicable state or federal law or regulation concerning confidential health information) shall be produced in encrypted form and the production media shall be labeled "MAY CONTAIN NON-PUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION" or "MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL HEALTH INFORMATION" as applicable.

If a Producing Party encrypts or "locks" the production, the Producing Party shall simultaneously send, under separate cover, an explanation of how to decrypt the files.

VI. Processing Specifications

A. Redactions: With the exception of completely non-responsive documents attached to an otherwise responsive document, no redactions will be made to responsive documents except to redact privileged or otherwise protected information, or personally identifiable information related to plan participants in the Oracle 401(k) Plan Committee meeting minutes or related materials. However, the Producing Party must ensure that any attached document not produced on the basis that it is completely, non-responsive is identified to the Receiving Party. If, during the course of discovery, the Parties identify other kinds of information that any Party has a reasonable basis for redacting, the Parties will meet and confer before such redactions are made. If the issue cannot be resolved, the Parties will seek resolution from the Court. In lieu of redacting an entire document, the Producing Party may produce a slip-sheet for full documents meeting the above redaction criteria.

B. ESI Date and Time Processing: Each Party's ESI should be processed using a Coordinated Universal Time (or UTC) Time Zone for all data.

C. Deduplication: A Party is only required to produce a single copy of a responsive document and a Party may de-duplicate responsive ESI (based on MD5 or SHA-1 hash values at the document level) across custodians. For e-mails with attachments, the hash value shall be generated based on the parent-child document grouping. Deduplication shall not break apart families. However, metadata identifying all custodians in possession of each document that is removed as a duplicate must be produced in the "CUSTODIAN" or "DUPLICATE CUSTODIAN" or Duplicate Folder/Path field in the production load file subject to any exceptions provided in Appendix A.

D. Email Thread Suppression: The Parties agree to meet and confer to the extent a party intends to use email thread suppression to exclude documents from production. The producing party will disclose its intention to use thread suppression in this manner prior to the applicable production deadline and with sufficient time to raise the issue with the Court, if necessary.

VII. Identification and Collection of Documents

A. Except as otherwise agreed in this Stipulation, the Parties will continue to meet and confer in an effort to agree (or reach impasse) upon the following by June 20, 2016, or as soon thereafter as practicable:

1. List of key records custodians;

2. Search methodology to be applied, including, but not limited to, any search parameters, search terms, and date restrictions, if necessary;

3. Location of relevant data sources including custodial and non-custodial sources. This includes identifying both accessible and claimed inaccessible sources, and, storage facilities.

B. Search Methodology:

1. Email and Non-Email: the parties agree to search for and produce responsive records from sources of hard copy and ESI to the extent such locations may contain responsive information as outlined in Section VII.C.

2. Determinations of discoverability and responsiveness shall be made by the Producing Party.

C. Location of Hard Copy and ESI: To the extent the following sources are identified by the agreed-upon records custodians, or individuals identified by the agreed-upon records custodian who have knowledge of the operation and administration of the Plan, as containing potentially responsive data (hard copy or ESI), and within the Producing Party's possession, custody or control the Producing Party will search the following sources to the extent they are reasonably accessible:

1. Custodians' hard copy files;

2. Custodians' local hard drives;

3. Custodians' mobile devices, to the extent such devices are within the possession, custody, or control of the Producing Party;

4. Custodian's personal email accounts and computers;

5. Custodians' personal network drive;

6. Custodians' reasonably accessible corporate email accounts;

7. A custodians' removable or portable media (including, but not limited to, thumb or flash drives, external hard drives, CDs or DVDs);

8. Cloud drives or offsite electronic storage of documents;

9. Hard copy documents stored offsite;

10. Network drives or active server directories (i.e., shared drives);

11. Databases;

12. Shared email accounts; and

13. Other sources later identified.

VIII. Preservation

A. The Parties acknowledge that they have an obligation to take reasonable and proportional steps to preserve discoverable information in the Party's possession, custody or control.

B. The Parties agree that the circumstances of this case do not warrant the preservation, collection, review, or production of ESI that is not reasonably accessible because they anticipate that enough relevant information can be yielded from reasonably accessible sources and, as necessary and appropriate, supplemented with deposition discovery. Moreover, the remote possibility of additional relevant information existing in not reasonably accessible sources is substantially outweighed by the burden and cost of preservation, collection, review and production of ESI from sources that are not reasonably accessible. The Parties agree that the following ESI is not reasonably accessible:

1. Data retained on back-up tapes.

2. Deleted, shadowed, damaged, residual, slack, fragmented, or other data only accessible by forensics.

3. Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system.

4. On-line access data such as temporary Internet files, history, cache, cookies, and the like.

5. Data stored on photocopiers, scanners and fax machines.

6. Data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically, such as last-opened dates.

7. Server, system or network logs.

8. Electronic data (e.g., email, calendars, contact data, and notes) that exist only on a mobile device (e.g., iPhone, iPad, Android, and Blackberry devices) that is neither synched to nor retrievable from another source or device, provided that such electronic data is routinely saved elsewhere (e.g., on a server, laptop, desktop computer, or "cloud" storage) that the Producing Party believes, after necessary interviews, does not contain relevant or responsive information.

C. However, nothing herein shall prevent a Party from subsequently requesting that ESI identified above be preserved and produced if specific facts demonstrate a particular need for such evidence that justifies the burden of preservation and retrieval. Further, nothing herein shall prevent a Party from requesting and receiving additional detail and explanation from the Producing Party regarding any of the above items that would allow the Requesting Party to further evaluate the substance of the information and the burden and costs of retrieving and providing this information.

IX. Privilege and Privilege Logs

A. The Parties agree that (a) communications to or from Oracle's employees, agents, and representatives and from or to Oracle's in-house or outside legal counsel relating to this litigation, (b) any work product of counsel and Parties relating to this litigation, (c) any internal communications within a law firm relating to this litigation, and (d) any communications regarding litigation holds or preservation, collection, or review in direct connection with this lawsuit need not be included on a privilege log.

B. During the limited discovery period pending a ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss, the Parties agree that for documents redacted or withheld from production on the basis of attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine and/or any other applicable privilege, and not otherwise exempted under Section A or any Rules or Local Rules, the Producing Party shall prepare a privilege log and provide a copy of same, within 30 days after the 90-day production deadline set forth in the parties' proposed joint scheduling order, in compliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). To the extent any productions occur after the 90-day production deadline, the Producing Party shall prepare a privilege log and provide a copy of the same within 21 days of the corresponding production. To the extent the Producing Party concludes in good faith that it will be unable to provide the privilege log within the applicable period set forth above, it will promptly and in advance of the relevant deadline notify the Producing Party so the Parties can meet and confer to determine the earliest practicable time the privilege log(s) can be provided to the Requesting Party. The privilege log(s) described above shall contain for each document claimed as privileged, the following information:

1. BEGNO 2. ENDNO 3. ALL CUSTODIANS 4. DATE 5. AUTHOR 6. TO 7. CC 8. BCC 9. PRIVILEGE CLAIM ASSERTED (ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND/OR WORK PRODUCT) 10. SUFFICIENT DESCRIPTION OF THE DOCUMENT OR COMMUNICATION AT ISSUE THAT WILL ALLOW THE RECEIVING PARTY AND THE COURT TO ASSESS THE CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE

C. In an effort to avoid unnecessary expense and burden, after the Court rules on Defendants' motion to dismiss, the parties agree to meet and confer as to whether a Producing Party will be permitted to produce a summary log in lieu of a more detailed privilege log as set forth in Sections IX(B) above or whether a more detailed privilege log will be required throughout the remainder of the litigation.

X. Third Party Documents

A Party that issues a non-Party subpoena ("Issuing Party") shall include a copy of this Stipulation with the subpoena and state that the Parties to the litigation have requested that third parties produce documents in accordance with the specifications set forth herein. However, third parties are not required to produce documents as specified herein. The Issuing Party shall produce any documents obtained pursuant to a non-Party subpoena to the opposing Party. Nothing in this Stipulation is intended or may be interpreted to narrow, expand, or otherwise affect the rights of the Parties or third Parties to object to a subpoena.

XI. Costs and Burden

The burdens placed on the Parties during this litigation, including during discovery, must be proportional to the needs of the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1; Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). All Parties reserve the right to seek shifting or sharing of certain discovery costs, including vendor and attorneys' fees, in appropriate circumstances.

XII. Good Faith

The Parties shall make their best efforts to comply with and resolve any differences concerning compliance with this Stipulation. If a Producing Party cannot comply with any material aspect of this Stipulation, such Party shall inform the Requesting Party as to why compliance with the Stipulation was unreasonable or not possible within fifteen (15) days after so learning. No Party may seek relief from the Court concerning compliance with the Stipulation unless it has conferred with other affected Parties to the action.

APPENDIX A TO STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF HARD COPY DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION

I. Production Format

A. Hard Copy Documents: Documents retained in hard copy form may be produced as PDF or single page black and white, Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with an .opt image cross-reference file and a delimited database load file (i.e., .dat) with applicable objective coding fields listed below. The delimited database load file shall include the page-document relationship and Bates number and page count and OCR'd text, as well as any other information specified in Parts C and D below, and in the manner specified in Parts C and D below (as applicable). If a produced TIFF image is unreadable or appears to be otherwise missing information, the Requesting Party may notify the Producing Party who will reproduce the document or portion of the document if the original document is not similarly obscured. The Parties will discuss reasonable requests for production of color or oversized documents on a document-by-document or category-by-category basis.

B. Electronically Stored Information (ESI): Except as otherwise noted in the [Proposed] Stipulation and Order for Discovery of Hard Copy Documents and Electronically Stored Information, herein or by agreement of the parties, ESI not requiring redaction shall be produced in tiff + metadata format, except for Excel files, Word files, PowerPoint files, and .pdf files, which shall be produced in native format. ESI produced in tiff + metadata format will be produced as single-page, black and white, Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with an .opt image cross-reference file and a delimited database load file (i.e., .dat). ESI requiring redactions will be provided in the same format with OCR text performed after applicable redactions are applied to the produced image. If appropriate, the Producing Party may redact Excel files natively as long as the redacted text is clearly identified. The Parties will discuss reasonable requests for production of color or oversized documents on a document-by-document or category-by-category basis. The Parties agree to meet and confer as to whether the Producing Party is required to produce files other than those set forth in this paragraph in native format.

Native Files will be produced together with a relative file path to the Native File provided in the metadata load file. The extractable metadata and text shall be produced in the same manner as other documents that originated in electronic form to the extent that metadata exists or is reasonably accessible or available for any files produced. If a Producing Party wishes to designate a Native File "Confidential," it shall do so by producing the Native File on media that is labeled "Confidential" or by branding the placeholder TIFF image "Confidential."

C. Bates Numbering: Each page of a tiff produced document will have a legible, unique identifier ("Bates number") assigned and electronically "burned" onto the image. The identifier shall include an alpha prefix along with a fixed number, e.g., ABC000001. This format must remain consistent across all production numbers and be placed on the lower right corner of all images so as not to unreasonably obliterate or obscure any information. No other legend or stamp will be placed on a document image other than confidentiality legends (where applicable) or redactions.

D. Associated Delimited Text File and Metadata Fields: A database load file shall be provided in the Concordance ".dat" file format that holds metadata in fields as a delimited text load file. For the load file, the Parties should use Concordance standard delimiters (ASCII 020 corresponding to a comma, ASCII 254 corresponding to a double quote, ASCII 174 corresponding to a new line, and a semicolon used to separate values). To the extent captured at the time of the collection and processing, the fielded data should include all the metadata fields listed below for a file/document in addition to the unitization (including the production number of the first and last page of each document) and attachments (including information sufficient to identify the parent and child relationships of all documents that are or have attachments). The first line of the data load file should contain the field headers indicating the contents of each field, and each subsequent line should contain the fielded data for each document. Load files shall include the metadata fields listed below, or substantially identical metadata fields, to the extent already in existence and reasonably accessible. The Producing Party may produce additional fields, but shall provide definitional information regarding such field(s) values no later than the time of delivery of any production containing such fields. To the extent that metadata does not exist or is not reasonably accessible or available for any documents produced, nothing in this Stipulation shall require any Party to extract, capture, collect generate or produce such data. However, the Parties will use reasonable efforts to collect and process ESI in such a manner as to capture the metadata fields required by this Stipulation.

Hard Copy

FIELD NAME FIELD DESCRIPTION BEGBATES Beginning production number or Bates number for a given file/document ENDBATES Ending production number or Bates number for a given file/document BegAttach EndAttach PAGECOUNT Number of pages for the document TEXT Relative path to OCR text file Confidentiality Confidentiality Designation Redaction Redaction Reason Custodian Custodian or Source

ESI

FIELD NAME SAMPLE DATA FIELD DESCRIPTION APPLICABLE FILE TYPE(S) BEGBATES ABC000001 Beginning production E-mail and E-Doc number or Bates number for a given file/document ENDBATES ABC000002 Ending production number or E-mail and E-Doc Bates number for a given file/document BEGATTACH ABC000001 Beginning production E-mail and E-Doc number or Bates number for the attachment range ENDATTACH ABC000015 Ending production number or E-mail and E-Doc Bates number for the attachment range PARENT_BATES ABC000001 First Bates number of parent E-mail and E-Doc document/e-mail **This PARENT_BATES field should be populated in each record representing an attachment "child" document. CHILD_BATES ABC000002; First Bates number of "child" E-mail and E-Doc attachment(s); can be more ABC000014 than one Bates number listed depending on the number of attachments **The CHILD_BATES field should be populated in each record representing a "parent" document. CUSTODIAN Smith, John Person, shared file or other E-mail and E-Doc source from whom files were collected DUPLICATE Brown, To identify other custodians E-mail and E-Doc Julie; whose files contained a Black, particular document that was Joe eliminated through de-duplication to the extent not included in the CUSTODIAN field DUPLICATE \\serv To identify other paths or E-Mail and E-Doc ernam folder locations of files from e\shar a particular document that e\Fold was eliminated through de-duplication to the extent not included in the PATH field. SUBJECT Meeting Minutes Subject line extracted from E-mail e-mail message FROM Thompson, Frank Sender E-mail TO Coffman, Janice; Recipient E-mail Lee, William CC Cain, John Copyee E-mail BCC Stevens, Hunter Blind Copyee E-mail DATESENT* 10/12/2012 Sent date of an email E-mail message in the following format: MM/DD/YYYY TIMESENT* 07:05 PM Time the email was sent, E-mail with timezone normalized across all produced records DATERCVD* 10/12/2012 Date an email message was E-mail received in the following format: MM/DD/YYYY TIMERCVD* 07:05 PM Time the email was received, E-mail with timezone normalized across all produced records AUTHOR* Smith, John Name of person who created E-Doc document or email Parties acknowledge that the Author field may not actually be the Author of the document. FILENAME October Original file name of native E-Doc Agenda.doc document PATH C:\My Original path for documents E-mail and E-Doc Documents\Agenda (if this information has been captured) DATECREATED* 10/1/2011 Date document was created E-Doc Parties acknowledge that the Date Created field may not actually be the Date Created due to the ease of change to that field and the technical definition of the field (e.g., the created date reflects the date when the file was created in that particular location on the computer or on the other storage device location) TIMECREATED* 9:18 AM Time document was created E-Doc Parties acknowledge that the Time Created field may not actually be the Time Created due to the ease of change to that field and the technical definition of the field (e.g., the created time reflects the time when the file was created in that particular location on the computer or on the other storage device location) DATELASTMOD* 10/15/2011 Date the document was last E-Doc modified in MM/DD/YYYY format TIMELASTMOD* 11:07 AM Time file was last modified, E-Doc with timezone normalized across all produced records FILEEXT Msg File extension of native E-mail and E-Doc document PAGECOUNT 16 Number of pages for the E-mail and E-Doc document HASH d131dd02c5e6eec5 MD5 or SHA1 Hash Value E-mail and E-Doc 694d0698aff85c2fs ch5876217eab4004 5733b8fb789 NATIVEFILE D:\001\ABC000005 Original path or hyperlink to Native PATH .xls documents being produced in native file format TEXT Relative path to OCR or extracted text file E-mail and E-Doc extracted text or OCR for the document Redaction Privilege Reason for Redaction on a All Document

FootNotes


* As it relates to the date and time metadata fields included in the metadata fields above, the Producing Party reserves the right to produce as a single field (e.g. DATECREATED = DATECREATED + TIMECREATED) since the metadata may already be exported and logged as such.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer