CRAIG B. SHAFFER, Magistrate Judge.
Upon the parties' joint motion (Doc. 47), the court approves and adopts as an order of the court, the parties' attached Stipulation (originally filed at Doc. 47-1) for Discovery of Hard Copy Documents and Electronically Stored Information.
So ORDERED.
The Parties to the above-captioned action HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, by and through their undersigned counsel, that the following specifications shall govern discovery of all documents, electronically stored information ("ESI"), and any other materials and information produced by the Parties during discovery.
A. The Parties shall take reasonable steps to comply with the procedures set forth in this Stipulation.
B. To the extent reasonably possible, the production of documents shall be conducted to maximize efficient and quick access to documents and minimize related discovery costs. The terms of this Stipulation shall be construed so as to ensure the prompt, efficient, and cost-effective exchange of information consistent with the Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and any orders by this Court.
1. Except as specifically limited herein, this Stipulation governs the production of discoverable documents by the Parties during the litigation.
2. This Stipulation shall not enlarge, reduce, or otherwise affect the scope of discovery in this litigation as imposed by the Local Rules, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Court's orders, nor imply that discovery produced under the terms of this Stipulation is properly discoverable, relevant, or admissible in this or in any other litigation.
3. Subject to this Stipulation, the Parties' objections and responses to requests for production of documents and interrogatories, and the Agreed Protective Order on Confidentiality to be later entered by the Court, all documents that are responsive to discovery requests, are reasonably accessible, and that meet the proportionality factors set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b), shall be produced in the manner provided herein. Nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be interpreted to require disclosure of materials that a Party contends are not discoverable or are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other privilege that may be applicable. Additionally, nothing in this Stipulation and Order shall be deemed to waive or limit any Party's right to object to (and on that basis withhold) the production of documents or electronically stored information, or to seek relief from the production of certain documents or electronically stored information, or to move for protective order on the ground that the sources are not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost, or move to compel on the ground that there is good cause for the documents' production.
4. The Parties agree to promptly alert all other Parties concerning any technical problems associated with complying with this Stipulation. To the extent the Producing Party determine that compliance with this Stipulation imposes an undue burden or is not proportional with respect to any protocol, source, or search term listed herein, the Parties shall promptly confer in an effort to resolve the issue.
5. Consistent with their obligations, the Parties will attempt to resolve, in person, in writing (including e-mail), or by telephone, disputes regarding the issues set forth herein prior to filing a motion with the Court, or otherwise seeking relief. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute after a good faith effort, the Parties may seek Court intervention in accordance with the Court's procedures.
Hard copy documents that have not been scanned by the Producing Party may be produced as an exact hard copy, other than hard copy documents maintained at an off-site location that will be separately negotiated by the Parties. At the Producing Party's election, or if hard copy documents have already been scanned by the Producing Party, hard copy documents will be scanned and produced as either PDF or single-page, black and white, Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with an .opt image cross-reference file and a delimited database load file (i.e., .dat). The database load file shall contain the metadata fields listed in the attached Appendix A. The Parties will discuss reasonable requests for production of color or oversized documents on a document-by-document or category-by-category basis.
In scanning hard copy documents, multiple distinct documents should be scanned as they are maintained and stored in the ordinary course. The Producing Party shall provide OCR text for hard copy documents scanned for production. OCR is to be performed on a document level and provided in document-level *.txt files named to match the production number of the first page of the document to which the OCR text corresponds. In the case of an organized compilation of separate documents — for example, a binder containing several separate documents behind numbered tabs — the document behind each tab should be scanned separately, but the relationship among the documents in the binder should be reflected in the metadata fields.
Except as otherwise noted herein or agreed on by the Parties, and notwithstanding any format provisions in a Party's discovery requests, ESI will generally be produced in conformance with the specifications detailed in Appendix A. ESI shall be produced in tiff + metadata format, except for Excel files, Word files, PowerPoint files, and .pdf files, which shall be produced in native format, as specified in this Stipulation and Appendix A. In addition, all ESI will be produced with a delimited database load file containing the metadata fields listed in Appendix A and captured at the time of the collection. Any Party, in addition to producing designated ESI in native format, may produce ESI in a TIFF + metadata format as specified in Appendix A. The Parties will discuss reasonable requests for production of color or oversized documents on a document-by-document or category-by-category basis. The parties agree to meet and confer as to whether the Producing Party is required to produce files other than those set forth in this paragraph in native format.
To the extent discoverable electronic information is contained in structured data sources, the Parties will meet and confer to discuss the most appropriate and cost-effective production format, which may include an export of data or the creation of a report. There is no obligation for a Party to create reports in a format not already available in the structured data source.
Documents shall be exchanged on DVD-ROMs, CD-ROMs, USB drives, portable hard drives, through secure file transfer protocols (e.g., SFTP), or similar secure electronic transmission as agreed to by the Parties. The production media shall be labeled with the Volume Number along with the Bates Number range(s) of the materials, and where not practicable to do so, may be provided in an accompanying letter.
Any document production that may contain "non-public personal information" or confidential health information (as defined in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA") Privacy Rule and/or other applicable state or federal law or regulation concerning confidential health information) shall be produced in encrypted form and the production media shall be labeled "MAY CONTAIN NON-PUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION" or "MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL HEALTH INFORMATION" as applicable.
If a Producing Party encrypts or "locks" the production, the Producing Party shall simultaneously send, under separate cover, an explanation of how to decrypt the files.
A.
B.
C.
D.
A. Except as otherwise agreed in this Stipulation, the Parties will continue to meet and confer in an effort to agree (or reach impasse) upon the following by June 20, 2016, or as soon thereafter as practicable:
1. List of key records custodians;
2. Search methodology to be applied, including, but not limited to, any search parameters, search terms, and date restrictions, if necessary;
3. Location of relevant data sources including custodial and non-custodial sources. This includes identifying both accessible and claimed inaccessible sources, and, storage facilities.
B.
1. Email and Non-Email: the parties agree to search for and produce responsive records from sources of hard copy and ESI to the extent such locations may contain responsive information as outlined in Section VII.C.
2. Determinations of discoverability and responsiveness shall be made by the Producing Party.
C.
1. Custodians' hard copy files;
2. Custodians' local hard drives;
3. Custodians' mobile devices, to the extent such devices are within the possession, custody, or control of the Producing Party;
4. Custodian's personal email accounts and computers;
5. Custodians' personal network drive;
6. Custodians' reasonably accessible corporate email accounts;
7. A custodians' removable or portable media (including, but not limited to, thumb or flash drives, external hard drives, CDs or DVDs);
8. Cloud drives or offsite electronic storage of documents;
9. Hard copy documents stored offsite;
10. Network drives or active server directories (i.e., shared drives);
11. Databases;
12. Shared email accounts; and
13. Other sources later identified.
A. The Parties acknowledge that they have an obligation to take reasonable and proportional steps to preserve discoverable information in the Party's possession, custody or control.
B. The Parties agree that the circumstances of this case do not warrant the preservation, collection, review, or production of ESI that is not reasonably accessible because they anticipate that enough relevant information can be yielded from reasonably accessible sources and, as necessary and appropriate, supplemented with deposition discovery. Moreover, the remote possibility of additional relevant information existing in not reasonably accessible sources is substantially outweighed by the burden and cost of preservation, collection, review and production of ESI from sources that are not reasonably accessible. The Parties agree that the following ESI is not reasonably accessible:
1. Data retained on back-up tapes.
2. Deleted, shadowed, damaged, residual, slack, fragmented, or other data only accessible by forensics.
3. Random access memory (RAM), temporary files, or other ephemeral data that are difficult to preserve without disabling the operating system.
4. On-line access data such as temporary Internet files, history, cache, cookies, and the like.
5. Data stored on photocopiers, scanners and fax machines.
6. Data in metadata fields that are frequently updated automatically, such as last-opened dates.
7. Server, system or network logs.
8. Electronic data (e.g., email, calendars, contact data, and notes) that exist only on a mobile device (e.g., iPhone, iPad, Android, and Blackberry devices) that is neither synched to nor retrievable from another source or device, provided that such electronic data is routinely saved elsewhere (e.g., on a server, laptop, desktop computer, or "cloud" storage) that the Producing Party believes, after necessary interviews, does not contain relevant or responsive information.
C. However, nothing herein shall prevent a Party from subsequently requesting that ESI identified above be preserved and produced if specific facts demonstrate a particular need for such evidence that justifies the burden of preservation and retrieval. Further, nothing herein shall prevent a Party from requesting and receiving additional detail and explanation from the Producing Party regarding any of the above items that would allow the Requesting Party to further evaluate the substance of the information and the burden and costs of retrieving and providing this information.
A. The Parties agree that (a) communications to or from Oracle's employees, agents, and representatives and from or to Oracle's in-house or outside legal counsel relating to this litigation, (b) any work product of counsel and Parties relating to this litigation, (c) any internal communications within a law firm relating to this litigation, and (d) any communications regarding litigation holds or preservation, collection, or review in direct connection with this lawsuit need not be included on a privilege log.
B. During the limited discovery period pending a ruling on Defendants' motion to dismiss, the Parties agree that for documents redacted or withheld from production on the basis of attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine and/or any other applicable privilege, and not otherwise exempted under Section A or any Rules or Local Rules, the Producing Party shall prepare a privilege log and provide a copy of same, within 30 days after the 90-day production deadline set forth in the parties' proposed joint scheduling order, in compliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). To the extent any productions occur after the 90-day production deadline, the Producing Party shall prepare a privilege log and provide a copy of the same within 21 days of the corresponding production. To the extent the Producing Party concludes in good faith that it will be unable to provide the privilege log within the applicable period set forth above, it will promptly and in advance of the relevant deadline notify the Producing Party so the Parties can meet and confer to determine the earliest practicable time the privilege log(s) can be provided to the Requesting Party. The privilege log(s) described above shall contain for each document claimed as privileged, the following information:
C. In an effort to avoid unnecessary expense and burden, after the Court rules on Defendants' motion to dismiss, the parties agree to meet and confer as to whether a Producing Party will be permitted to produce a summary log in lieu of a more detailed privilege log as set forth in Sections IX(B) above or whether a more detailed privilege log will be required throughout the remainder of the litigation.
A Party that issues a non-Party subpoena ("Issuing Party") shall include a copy of this Stipulation with the subpoena and state that the Parties to the litigation have requested that third parties produce documents in accordance with the specifications set forth herein. However, third parties are not required to produce documents as specified herein. The Issuing Party shall produce any documents obtained pursuant to a non-Party subpoena to the opposing Party. Nothing in this Stipulation is intended or may be interpreted to narrow, expand, or otherwise affect the rights of the Parties or third Parties to object to a subpoena.
The burdens placed on the Parties during this litigation, including during discovery, must be proportional to the needs of the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1; Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). All Parties reserve the right to seek shifting or sharing of certain discovery costs, including vendor and attorneys' fees, in appropriate circumstances.
The Parties shall make their best efforts to comply with and resolve any differences concerning compliance with this Stipulation. If a Producing Party cannot comply with any material aspect of this Stipulation, such Party shall inform the Requesting Party as to why compliance with the Stipulation was unreasonable or not possible within fifteen (15) days after so learning. No Party may seek relief from the Court concerning compliance with the Stipulation unless it has conferred with other affected Parties to the action.
A.
B. Electronically Stored Information (ESI): Except as otherwise noted in the [Proposed] Stipulation and Order for Discovery of Hard Copy Documents and Electronically Stored Information, herein or by agreement of the parties, ESI not requiring redaction shall be produced in tiff + metadata format, except for Excel files, Word files, PowerPoint files, and .pdf files, which shall be produced in native format. ESI produced in tiff + metadata format will be produced as single-page, black and white, Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with an .opt image cross-reference file and a delimited database load file (i.e., .dat). ESI requiring redactions will be provided in the same format with OCR text performed after applicable redactions are applied to the produced image. If appropriate, the Producing Party may redact Excel files natively as long as the redacted text is clearly identified. The Parties will discuss reasonable requests for production of color or oversized documents on a document-by-document or category-by-category basis. The Parties agree to meet and confer as to whether the Producing Party is required to produce files other than those set forth in this paragraph in native format.
Native Files will be produced together with a relative file path to the Native File provided in the metadata load file. The extractable metadata and text shall be produced in the same manner as other documents that originated in electronic form to the extent that metadata exists or is reasonably accessible or available for any files produced. If a Producing Party wishes to designate a Native File "Confidential," it shall do so by producing the Native File on media that is labeled "Confidential" or by branding the placeholder TIFF image "Confidential."
C.
D.